Sports Utility Vehicles and Vulnerable Road Users

We read with interest the article by Robertson,1 and we certainly agree that the sports utility vehicles (SUVs) pose an increased risk to small car occupants as well as vulnerable road users, such as pedestrians, cyclists, older persons, and children.2 In many developing countries, pedestrians, cyclists, rickshaw operators, and moped users represent the majority of road users. These countries rarely have the resources to physically separate such road users from car traffic. Many developing countries have no sidewalks or bicycle paths and those that do exist are heavily obstructed by trees, trash, drainage ditches, and vendors selling goods. Pedestrian injuries are a leading cause of global death and injury burden, accounting for 65% of the 1.2 million annual road deaths.3 Collisions between pedestrians and vehicles present a major challenge for public health, trauma and emergency medicine, and traffic safety professionals. Yet, in spite of the size of the pedestrian injury problem, research has concentrated almost exclusively on increasing the survival rates for vehicle occupants.4 A man waits for his identification wristband to be scanned during a mock evacuation drill May 23, 2006 in New Orleans, Louisiana. The two-day drill is being held in New Orleans and Baton Rouge in order to help the area prepare for the upcoming hurricane season. Photograph by Mario Tama. Courtesy of Getty Images. Recent US and United Arab Emirates studies have reported that increased numbers of SUVs and pickup trucks were associated with pedestrian deaths and a higher pedestrian injury severity score,5,6 and SUVs were 4 times as likely to be associated with fatal injury for the 5- to 9-year-old age group.7 Method of transportation is an important determinant of public health, affecting physical activity levels, social and economic opportunities, and general well-being.8 Extensive literature on the various health benefits of physical activity has illustrated the need to understand the determinants, risks, and barriers of physical activity. Vehicle danger is a disincentive to active lifestyles in that reducing the risks of fatal traffic injury for pedestrians and cyclists is an important part of any strategy to encourage walking and cycling to combat childhood obesity. Walking and cycling are essential modes of travel for many people living in low- and middle-income countries. Safe walking and cycling should be promoted, because their environmental, economic, and health benefits are significant.9 Potential reduction in the costs of treating heart disease if adults walked regularly has been calculated in the United States, saving US$5.6 billion annually if 10% of adults began a regular walking program.10 Safety standards for vehicle front-end construction, which would make vehicles less hazardous to pedestrians and cyclists, may be as important as standards that affect vehicle occupants; however, political obstacles have made such standards difficult to implement.1,2,5,7

Business · Environmental health · Injury prevention · Medical emergency · Occupational safety and health · Pedestrian · Poison control · Suicide prevention · Transport engineering · Truck · Engineering · Human Factors and Ergonomics · Injury Epidemiology and Prevention · Medicine · Traffic and Road Safety · Urban Transport and Accessibility

• What are the most effective ways of improving population health through transport interventions? Evidence from systematic reviews

  D S Morrison, M Petticrew et al.•Journal of Epidemiology and…•2003

  Add to list

• Blood and Oil

  Leon S Robertson•American Journal of Public Health•2006

  Add to list