Estimating the Risks and Benefits of Nicotine Replacement Therapy for Smoking Cessation in the United States

Bibliographic Data

ID11024932
AuthorsBenjamin J Apelberg (0009-0005-9718-7207, At the time of the study, Benjamin J. Apelberg, Georgiana Onicescu, Erika Avila-Tang, and Jonathan M. Samet were with the Institute for Global Tobacco Control, Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins University, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD.), Georgiana Onicescu (At the time of the study, Benjamin J. Apelberg, Georgiana Onicescu, Erika Avila-Tang, and Jonathan M. Samet were with the Institute for Global Tobacco Control, Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins University, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD.), Erika Avila-Tang (At the time of the study, Benjamin J. Apelberg, Georgiana Onicescu, Erika Avila-Tang, and Jonathan M. Samet were with the Institute for Global Tobacco Control, Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins University, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD.), Jonathan M Samet (0000-0001-5676-9175, At the time of the study, Benjamin J. Apelberg, Georgiana Onicescu, Erika Avila-Tang, and Jonathan M. Samet were with the Institute for Global Tobacco Control, Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins University, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD.)
Year2010
Volume100
Issue2
Pages341-348
Publication date2010-02-01
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueAmerican Journal of Public Health (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0090-0036 • E-ISSN: 1541-0048
PublisherAmerican Public Health Association (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.2105/ajph.2008.147223
PMID20019322
PMCIDPMC2804631
OpenAlexW2094275918
LanguageEN
Citations received2
References cited32

Objectives. To compare potential population-wide benefits and risks, we examined the potential impact of increased nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) use for smoking cessation on future US mortality. Methods. We developed a simulation model incorporating a Monte Carlo uncertainty analysis, with data from the 2005 National Health Interview Survey and Cancer Prevention Study II. We estimated the number of avoided premature deaths from smoking attributable to increased NRT use, before and after incorporating assumptions about NRT harm. Results. We estimate that a gradual increase in the proportion of NRT-aided quit attempts to 100% by 2025 would lead to 40 000 (95% credible interval = 31 000, 50 000) premature deaths avoided over a 20-year period. Most avoided deaths would be attributable to lung cancer and cardiovascular disease. After we incorporated assumptions about potential risk from long-term NRT, the estimate of avoided premature deaths from all causes declined to 32 000. Conclusions. Even after we assumed some harm from long-term NRT use, the benefits from increased cessation success far outweigh the risks. However, the projected reduction in premature mortality still reflects a small portion of the tobacco-related deaths expected over a 20-year period

Environmental health · Harm · Nicotine replacement therapy · Population · Smoking cessation · Demography · Medicine · Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study · Smoking Behavior and Cessation · Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access