Healthy Communities

As guest editors for the forum on community-oriented primary care (COPC) and as authors of an article that traces the conceptual roots of COPC and its proposed future role as an “important conceptual framework” for practice, Mullan and Epstein note the existence of various movements in health care that provide natural allies for COPC.1 We would like to suggest an additional ally—the Healthy Communities movement. Formulated almost 2 decades ago, the principles of Healthy Communities (HC)2 emphasize a democratic approach to addressing community problems that focuses on strengths.3,4 In merging the COPC and HC approaches to engaging community members, we have discovered a positive synergy. While both approaches spring from a common framework of health broadly defined, the language of HC is more lay friendly and broadly participatory. It begins with members of the lay and professional communities imagining what their neighborhoods and communities can become. This step of creating a shared vision, explicit in HC but only implicit in COPC, is an important element of the process. It develops a common bond and identifies areas of shared concerns.5 Mullan and Epstein note, “The idea of community is the core element [of COPC] and the point of departure for the COPC process.”1 Despite the renewed emphasis on community engagement that has appeared in the COPC literature,6,7 however, few articles do more than encourage clinicians to work with community members. Indeed, the emphasis has been placed on the epidemiological skills needed to describe a community and identify its health problems and risks; the skills needed to play a collaborative leadership role in this process are seldom described adequately. One of the contributions of the HC literature is discussion about building effective partnerships among the many players, not simply the health care facility and community members, and the acknowledgement that relationship building and democratic decisionmaking take time. This literature specifically addresses the importance of attention to community-building processes, another area that the COPC literature often finesses. Initiatives that grow from an explicit HC framework recognize the importance of learning to live with—indeed, to value—the tension inherent in balancing process and outcomes simultaneously.8 One example of the allied COPC–HC approach is occurring in central Massachusetts, where a family medicine practice hosted a monthly 8-part discussion series on the principles and precepts of COPC. At the series’ conclusion, organizers made a purposeful, subtle shift from using the COPC paradigm exclusively to incorporating the principles and practice of HC as a way to engage additional citizens. The result has been a community–professional partnership called the East Quabbin Alliance (EQUAL), which has realized remarkable successes in the areas of adolescent and environmental health. The group regularly engages additional citizens and remains closely identified with the family medicine practice. The notion that other movements can be natural allies of COPC is an important one that practitioners who seek to amalgamate primary care and public health should recognize. As Mullan and Epstein note, while COPC appeals on the basis of practicality and principle, it has not become the prevalent mode of practice in health systems.1 All of us who work in COPC would be wise to seek allies that can help strengthen our efforts. We have found one in Healthy Communities.9

Citizen journalism · Community engagement · Element (criminal law) · Participatory action research · Political science · Public relations · Sociology · Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations · Law · Primary Care and Health Outcomes · Public Health Policies and Education

• Academic Medicine’s Fourth Mission

  Open Access•Courtney L Savage Hoggard, Arthur Kaufman et al.•Academic Medicine•2023

  Add to list

• Community-Oriented Primary Care

  Fitzhugh Mullan, Leon Epstein•American Journal of Public Health•2002

  Add to list