Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Impact of Health Insurance Type on Trends in Newborn Circumcision, United States, 2000 to 2010

Bibliographic Data

ID11025433
AuthorsLee Warner (All of the authors are with the Division of Reproductive Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA.), Shanna Cox (0000-0002-0377-9270, All of the authors are with the Division of Reproductive Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA.), Maura K Whiteman (0000-0003-1935-6317, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion), Maura Whiteman (All of the authors are with the Division of Reproductive Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA.), Denise J Jamieson (0000-0003-2597-1201, All of the authors are with the Division of Reproductive Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA.), Maurizio Macaluso (0000-0002-2977-9690, All of the authors are with the Division of Reproductive Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA.), Pooja Bansil (0000-0002-2531-3391, All of the authors are with the Division of Reproductive Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA.), Elena V Kuklina (0000-0002-9686-6495, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion), Elena Kuklina (All of the authors are with the Division of Reproductive Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA.), Athena P Kourtis (0000-0003-1585-1310, All of the authors are with the Division of Reproductive Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA.), Samuel F Posner (0000-0003-1574-585X, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion), Samuel Posner (All of the authors are with the Division of Reproductive Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA.), Wanda D Barfield (0000-0002-5875-0475, All of the authors are with the Division of Reproductive Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA.)
Year2015
Volume105
Issue9
Pages1943-1949
Publication date2015-09-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueAmerican Journal of Public Health (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0090-0036 • E-ISSN: 1541-0048
PublisherAmerican Public Health Association (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.2105/ajph.2015.302629
PMID26180994
OpenAlexW2124642117
LanguageEN
Citations received2
References cited19

Objectives. We explored how changes in insurance coverage contributed to recent nationwide decreases in newborn circumcision. Methods. Hospital discharge data from the 2000–2010 Nationwide Inpatient Sample were analyzed to assess trends in circumcision incidence among male newborn birth hospitalizations covered by private insurance or Medicaid. We examined the impact of insurance coverage on circumcision incidence. Results. Overall, circumcision incidence decreased significantly from 61.3% in 2000 to 56.9% in 2010 in unadjusted analyses (P for trend = .008), but not in analyses adjusted for insurance status (P for trend = .46) and other predictors (P for trend = .55). Significant decreases were observed only in the South, where adjusted analyses revealed decreases in circumcision overall (P for trend = .007) and among hospitalizations with Medicaid (P for trend = .005) but not those with private insurance (P for trend = .13). Newborn male birth hospitalizations covered by Medicaid increased from 36.0% (2000) to 50.1% (2010; P for trend Conclusions. Shifts in insurance coverage, particularly toward Medicaid, likely contributed to decreases in newborn circumcision nationwide and in the South. Barriers to the availability of circumcision should be revisited, particularly for families who desire but have less financial access to the procedure

Health care · Health insurance · Incidence (geometry) · Medicaid · Political science · Private insurance · Demography · Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting Issues · Genital Health and Disease · Medicine · Urological Disorders and Treatments

  • Physician Perspectives on Performing Newborn Circumcisions

    Open Access•Emilie K Johnson, Ilina Rosoklija et al.•Maternal and Child Health Journal•2023

  • Circumcision Status Regret and Satisfaction

    Open Access•Trevor J Maloney, C Loeb et al.•Sexuality Research and Social…•2022

  • Estimating the Relative Risk in Cohort Studies and Clinical Trials of Common Outcomes

    L-A McNutt, Louise‐Anne McNutt•American Journal of Epidemiology•2003

  • Alternatives for logistic regression in cross-sectional studies

    Open Access•Aluísio J D Barros, Aluisio JD Barros et al.•BMC Medical Research Methodology•2003

  • Determinants and Policy Implications of Male Circumcision in the United States

    Arleen Leibowitz, Arleen A Leibowitz et al.•American Journal of Public Health•2009

Unique citing works2
Citations per year0,5
Citation span2022 - 2023 (2)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 2

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae