Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Federal Tax Law Allows Academics to Lobby

Bibliographic Data

ID11025720
AuthorsEric K Gorovitz (Eric K. Gorovitz is with Adler & Colvin LLP, San Francisco, CA. Jon S. Vernick is with the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD.), Eric Gorovitz (Johns Hopkins University), Jon S Vernick (0000-0002-6480-6105, Eric K. Gorovitz is with Adler & Colvin LLP, San Francisco, CA. Jon S. Vernick is with the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD.)
Year2010
Volume100
Issue7
Pages1157-1158
Publication date2010-07-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueAmerican Journal of Public Health (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0090-0036 • E-ISSN: 1541-0048
PublisherAmerican Public Health Association (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.2105/ajph.2010.191734
PMID20466945
PMCIDPMC2882413
OpenAlexW2029504531
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited2

As public health lawyers and long-time advocates for the use of law as a tool to improve the public's health, we applaud Longest and Huber's call for more direct involvement by public health academics in public policy advocacy.1 Their description of the law governing lobbying by university employees, however, suggested much more restriction on such activity than federal law actually imposes. We write to correct that misimpression. First, contrary to the authors’ assertion that “overt lobbying” by charities is prohibited, federal tax law expressly permits charities to lobby within certain limits, and even provides powerful tools that allow charities to lobby without putting their tax-exempt status at risk.2 Second, the relevant definition of lobbying, as set forth in the Internal Revenue Code,3 does not include efforts to influence administrative regulations, as opposed to legislation. Third, the authors failed to describe several exceptions to the lobbying definition that allow public health faculty to communicate with legislators and take a position on specific legislation without engaging in lobbying. Two of the exceptions, for “non-partisan analysis, study, and research”4,5 and for responses to a written request from a government body for technical advice,4,5 are particularly useful for public health academics. We agree with Longest and Huber that advocates, including public health academics, must be mindful of the relevant law governing lobbying by charities when contemplating initiating a communication intended to influence legislation. With sound legal advice, however, those who work for universities or other charitable organizations can participate directly in shaping public health policy through effective advocacy, including both direct and grassroots lobbying

Environmental health · Political science · Tax law · Tax reform · Healthcare Policy and Management · Law · Medicine · Public Health Policies and Education

  • Academic Advocacy

    Holly Fernandez Lynch, Alison Bateman-House et al.•Academic Medicine•2020

  • Schools of Public Health and the Health of the Public

    Beaufort B Longest, George A Huber•American Journal of Public Health•2010

  • Lobbying and advocacy for the public's health

    Jon S Vernick•American Journal of Public Health•1999

Unique citing works1
Citations per year0,17
Citation span2020 - 2020 (1)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 1

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae