Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

US “Safety Net” Clinics Provide Access to Effective Contraception for Adolescents and Young Women, 2017–2019

Bibliographic Data

ID11026000
AuthorsBlair G Darney (0000-0001-8120-028X, Blair G. Darney and Maria I. Rodriguez are with the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Oregon Health & Science University (OHSU), Portland. Blair G. Darney is also with Health Systems & Policy, OHSU–Portland State University joint School of Public Health. Frances M. Biel, Jee Oakley, and Erika K. Cottrell are with the Oregon Community Health Information Network, Inc., Portland. Erika K. Cottrell is also with the School of Medicine, OHSU.), Frances M Biel (0000-0002-9857-8729, Blair G. Darney and Maria I. Rodriguez are with the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Oregon Health & Science University (OHSU), Portland. Blair G. Darney is also with Health Systems & Policy, OHSU–Portland State University joint School of Public Health. Frances M. Biel, Jee Oakley, and Erika K. Cottrell are with the Oregon Community Health Information Network, Inc., Portland. Erika K. Cottrell is also with the School of Medicine, OHSU.), Jee Oakley (Blair G. Darney and Maria I. Rodriguez are with the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Oregon Health & Science University (OHSU), Portland. Blair G. Darney is also with Health Systems & Policy, OHSU–Portland State University joint School of Public Health. Frances M. Biel, Jee Oakley, and Erika K. Cottrell are with the Oregon Community Health Information Network, Inc., Portland. Erika K. Cottrell is also with the School of Medicine, OHSU.), María Isabel Rodríguez (0000-0002-3127-2581, Oregon Health & Science University), Erika K Cottrell (0000-0003-0481-4485, Blair G. Darney and Maria I. Rodriguez are with the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Oregon Health & Science University (OHSU), Portland. Blair G. Darney is also with Health Systems & Policy, OHSU–Portland State University joint School of Public Health. Frances M. Biel, Jee Oakley, and Erika K. Cottrell are with the Oregon Community Health Information Network, Inc., Portland. Erika K. Cottrell is also with the School of Medicine, OHSU.)
Year2022
Volume112
IssueS5
PagesS555-S562
Publication date2022-06-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueAmerican Journal of Public Health (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0090-0036 • E-ISSN: 1541-0048
PublisherAmerican Public Health Association (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.2105/ajph.2022.306913
PMID35767786
OpenAlexW4283746927
LanguageEN
References cited22

Objectives. To describe patterns of providing moderately effective versus the most effective contraception and of providing implants versus intrauterine devices in US community health centers. Methods. We conducted a historical cohort study (2017–2019). Outcomes were woman-level receipt of most effective contraception (long-acting reversible contraception; implants and intrauterine devices) or moderately effective contraception. We used logistic regression to identify patient and clinic factors associated with providing (1) most versus moderately effective methods, and (2) implants versus intrauterine devices. We calculated adjusted probabilities for both outcomes by age group. Results. We included 199 652 events of providing contraception to 114 280 women in 410 community health centers. Adjusted probabilities were similar across age groups for moderately versus most effective methods. However, the adjusted marginal means for receiving an implant compared with an intrauterine device were highest for adolescents (15–17 years: 78.2% [95% confidence interval (CI) = 75.6%, 80.6%]; 18–19 years: 69.5% [95% CI = 66.7%, 72.3%]). Women’s health specialists were more likely to provide most versus moderately effective contraception. Conclusions. Community health centers are an important access point for most effective contraception for women of all ages. Adolescents are more likely to use implants than intrauterine devices. (Am J Public Health. 2022;112(S5):S555–S562. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2022.306913 )

Cohort study · Confidence interval · Contraceptive implant · Environmental health · Family medicine · Family planning · Intrauterine device · Logistic regression · Long-acting reversible contraception · Obstetrics · Population · Public health · Research methodology · Demography · Global Maternal and Child Health · Internal Medicine · Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions · Medicine · Nursing · Reproductive Health and Contraception

  • Declines in Unintended Pregnancy in the United States, 2008–2011

    Lawrence B Finer, Mia Zolna et al.•New England Journal of Medicine•2016

  • Celebration meets caution

    Open Access•Jeanette A Higgins, Jenny A Higgins•Contraception•2014

  • Women or Larc First? Reproductive Autonomy And the Promotion of Long‐Acting Reversible Contraceptive Methods

    Open Access•Anne M Gomez, Liza Fuentes et al.•Perspectives on Sexual and…•2014

  • Barriers and Pathways to Providing Long‐Acting Reversible Contraceptives in Massachusetts Community Health Centers

    Open Access•Elizabeth Janiak, Jill Macleod Clark et al.•Perspectives on Sexual and…•2018

  • Game Change in Colorado

    Open Access•Sue Ricketts, Greta Klingler et al.•Perspectives on Sexual and…•2014

  • Changes to Contraceptive Method Use at Title X Clinics Following Delaware Contraceptive Access Now, 2008–2017

    Michel Boudreaux, Liyang Xie et al.•American Journal of Public Health•2020

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae