Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Is Breast Cancer a Disease of Affluence, Poverty, or Both? The Case of African American Women

Bibliographic Data

ID11026488
AuthorsNancy Krieger (0000-0002-4815-5947, Harvard School of Public Health, corresponding author)
Year2002
Volume92
Issue4
Pages611-613
Publication date2002-04-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueAmerican Journal of Public Health (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0090-0036 • E-ISSN: 1541-0048
PublisherAmerican Public Health Association (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.2105/ajph.92.4.611
PMID11919060
OpenAlexW2165233479
LanguageEN
Citations received13
References cited26

Breast cancer is currently the leading cause of cancer incidence among women worldwide. It accounts for nearly 1 in 4 cases of cancer among women, with 55% of cases occurring in more industrialized countries and 45% in less industrialized countries.1 According to recent data from the World Health Organization, rates are highest in the United States and lowest in the countries of eastern Asia: 91 and 18 per 100 000 woman-years, respectively (age standardized to the 2000 world standard population; Table 1 ▶).1 TABLE 1 —Breast Cancer Incidence and Mortality: US Rates in a Global Context Breast cancer is likewise the leading cause of cancer among US women (excluding nonmelanoma skin cancers), accounting for 30% of diagnosed cases.2 In the year 2000, an estimated 182 800 women and 1500 men were diagnosed with breast cancer2; corresponding average annual age-adjusted (to the 1970 US standard million) incidence rates per 100 000 population in the period 1994 to 1998 were 114.3 and 1.0.3 Between 1992 and 1998, rates were highest among White non-Hispanic women (120.5/100 000), followed by Black (101.5/100 000), Asian/Pacific Islander (78.1/100 000), Hispanic (68.5/100 000), and American Indian (50.5/100 000) women.3 Notably, no routinely available data exist on US population rates of breast cancer incidence (or rates for any other cancer site) stratified by socioeconomic position.4–6 One consequence is that, during the past 50 years, only 10 US population-based studies have quantified socioeconomic gradients in breast cancer incidence rates.7–16 Partly on the basis of results of US7–16 and European17–25 incidence studies and additional case–control investigations, breast cancer typically has been portrayed as a “disease of affluence.”19,26,27 For example, supporting the view that population distributions of breast cancer are linked to level of economic development, breast cancer incidence is currently estimated to be 2.7 times higher in more industrialized than in less industrialized countries (63 vs 23 per 100 000, age standardized to the 2000 world standard population; Table 1 ▶).1 A closer look at the evidence, however, reveals a more complex picture: although breast cancer historically has been more common in industrialized, affluent countries and among more affluent women in any given country (i.e., a positive socioeconomic gradient), incidence rates in poorer countries and among poorer women in more affluent countries are “catching up.”1,6,12,14–16,22,24 Within the United States, mortality data from the past 2 decades likewise reveal a declining positive class gradient in breast cancer mortality, probably reflecting changing class patterns in terms of both incidence and survival.28,29 A consistent finding is that once women are diagnosed with breast cancer, survival rates are much lower among those from poorer countries and, within any given country, among those who are poor or who face discrimination or both.28–30 The case of African American women is illustrative. Data from the US Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) cancer registry show that, during 1996 to 1998, the lifetime risk of breast cancer for Black women (10.1%) was 73% that of White women (13.8%), but their lifetime risk of dying of the disease was 7% higher (3.4% vs 3.2%).3 Moreover, among women aged 20 years, Black women were at higher risk than White women of developing breast cancer over the subsequent 20 years,3 thereby creating more of a burden at younger ages. Related data indicate that breast cancer is typically diagnosed at a younger age among Black and Hispanic women than among White women; likewise, it is typically diagnosed at a younger age in low-incidence than high-incidence countries.31,32 In addition, in terms of survival within each stage of cancer (localized, regional, or distant), data indicate that between 1992 and 1997, Black women were 17% less likely than White women to survive 5 years past diagnosis and 1.8 times more likely to be diagnosed at the most advanced stage (distant).3 Analogous population-based SEER data on US breast cancer incidence and survival rates stratified by socioeconomic position are not available,4,5 limiting population-based analyses of the extent to which observed Black–White disparities reflect inequalities in socioeconomic position. In the period from 1997 to 1999, the median household income among White Americans was $41 591, as compared with $26 608 among Black Americans,33 while 1999 poverty rates were 9.8% and 23.6% for White and Black Americans, respectively.34 In summary, in the case of women residing in the United States, White women are more likely than Black women to be diagnosed with breast cancer, but Black women are more likely to die of the disease. Of note, this excess breast cancer risk in White women has been declining over time, and rates among Black women have been “catching up.” For example, the breast cancer incidence rate among Black women was 80% of that among White women in 1973 (68.9 and 94.6 per 100 000, respectively, age standardized to the 1970 US standard million) but had climbed to 88% as of the period 1994 to 1998 (Table 1 ▶).3 Moreover, Black mortality rates worsened during the same time period: Black and White women had almost identical breast cancer mortality rates in 1973 (26.3 and 27.1 per 100 000, respectively, age standardized to the 1970 US standard million), but during 1994 to 1998 rates were 30% higher among Black women (Table 1 ▶).3 Combine relatively high incidence and relatively high mortality, and the net result is that US Black women have among the highest breast cancer mortality rates in the world. In conclusion, the conventional view that breast cancer is a “disease of affluence” is increasingly at odds with the empirical evidence and lived experiences of poorer women and women of color diagnosed with breast cancer.6,31,35 Misperceptions of the population burdens imposed by breast cancer can hinder efforts to understand, prevent, treat, and control this disease.6,35,36 It is time to move to a more accurate and complex assessment of social disparities in risks of being diagnosed with and dying from breast cancer

Breast cancer · Cancer · Context (archaeology) · Environmental health · Geography · Incidence (geometry) · Pacific islanders · Population · BRCA gene mutations in cancer · Cancer Risks and Factors · Demography · Global Cancer Incidence and Screening · Internal Medicine · Medicine

  • Ethnic notions and healthy paranoias

    Colette Marie Sims•Ethnicity and Health•2010

  • Linguistic and cultural barriers to care

    Quyen Ngo‐Metzger, Quyen Ngo-Metzger et al.•Journal of General Internal…•2003

  • Who and What Is a "Population"? Historical Debates, Current Controversies, and Implications for Understanding "Population Health" and Rectifying Health Inequities

    Open Access•Nancy Krieger•Milbank Quarterly•2012

  • Historical trends in breast Cancer among women in China from age-period-cohort modeling of the 1990–2015 breast Cancer mortality data

    Open Access•Yani Ding, Xinguang Chen et al.•BMC Public Health•2020

  • Locating diversity

    Open Access•L Mclafferty, Ranjana Chakrabarti•GeoJournal•2009

  • Increased breast cancer mortality only in the lower education group

    Open Access•Jinwook Bahk, Sung-Mi Jang et al.•International Journal for Equity…•2017

  • County-Level Association of Sexual Minority Density with Breast Cancer Incidence

    Open Access•Ulrike Boehmer, Al Ozonoff et al.•Sexuality Research and Social…•2010

  • Lifelong socioeconomic trajectory and premature mortality (35–65 years) in France

    Maria Melchior, Lisa Berkman et al.•Journal of Epidemiology and…•2006

  • The association of sidewalk walkability and physical disorder with area-level race and poverty

    Open Access•Cheryl M Kelly, Mario Schootman et al.•Journal of Epidemiology and…•2007

  • Race, Poverty, Affluence, and Breast Cancer

    Susan A Hall, Beverly Rockhill•American Journal of Public Health•2002

  • Communication and Racial Inequities in Health Care

    Open Access•Gary L Kreps•American Behavioral Scientist•2006

  • Health, Risk, and Resilience

    C Panter-Brick•Annual Review of Anthropology•2014

  • Cancer

    J Mcmullin•Annual Review of Anthropology•2016

  • Temporal trends in the socioeconomic gradient for breast cancer mortality among US women

    D K Wagener, Arthur Schatzkin•American Journal of Public Health•1994

  • Socioeconomic status and breast cancer mortality, 1989 through 1993

    Katherine Heck, K E Heck et al.•American Journal of Public Health•1997

  • Working from the inside out

    Open Access•Mary K Anglin•Social Science & Medicine•1997

  • Cancers of affluence

    Open Access•Arja Rimpelä, Arja H Rimpelä et al.•Social Science & Medicine•1987

Unique citing works13
Citations per year0,54
Citation span2002 - 2020 (19)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 12

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae