Promoting Transparency in Pharmaceutical Industry–Sponsored Research
Bibliographic Data
Strong, evidence-based practice requires that objective, unbiased research be available to inform individual clinical decisions, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and expert guideline recommendations. Industry has used seeding trials, publication planning, messaging, ghostwriting, and selective publication and reporting of trial outcomes to distort the medical literature and undermine clinical trial research by obscuring information relevant to patients and physicians. Policies that promote transparency in the clinical trial research process, through improved and expanded disclosure of investigator contributions and funding, comprehensive publicly available trial registration, and independent analysis of clinical trial data analysis may address these subversive practices by improving accountability among industry and investigators. Minimizing marketing's impact on clinical trial research and strengthening the science will protect medical literature's integrity and the public's health
Accountability · Alternative medicine · Business · Clinical trial · Family medicine · Guideline · Medical education · MEDLINE · Pharmaceutical industry · Political science · Public health · Public relations · Systematic review · Transparency (behavior) · Ethics in Clinical Research · Medicine · Meta-analysis and systematic reviews · Nursing · Pharmaceutical industry and healthcare · Pharmacology
US Federal Government Efforts to Improve Clinical Trial Transparency with Expanded Trial Registries and Open Data Sharing
Enhanced independence
The Important Distinction Between Peer-Reviewed and Predatory Journals
Diagnosing the declining industry sponsorship in clinical research
Views of Ethical Best Practices in Sharing Individual-Level Data From Medical and Public Health Research
Treating Our Way Out of Aids
Prospects for a transparency revolution in the field of business history
Scope and Impact of Financial Conflicts of Interest in Biomedical Research
Publication bias in clinical research
Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias
Selective Publication of Antidepressant Trials and Its Influence on Apparent Efficacy
Ghosts in the Machine
How pharmaceutical industry funding affects trial outcomes
| Citations per year | 0.58 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2014 - 2026 (13) |
| Highly cited | No |