Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Adapting and Extending a Typology to Identify Vaccine Misinformation on Twitter

Bibliographic Data

ID11029680
AuthorsAmelia M Jamison (0000-0002-3954-9581, Center for Health and Gender Equity), Amelia Jamison (Amelia M. Jamison, Kajal S. Parikh, and Adeena Malik are with the Maryland Center for Health Equity, School of Public Health, University of Maryland, College Park. David A. Broniatowski and Michael C. Smith are with the Department of Engineering Management and Systems Engineering, School of Engineering and Applied Science, and Institute for Data, Democracy, and Politics, The George Washington University, Washington, DC. Mark Dredze is with the Department of Computer Science, Whiting School of Engineering...), David Broniatowski (0000-0002-3302-9497, Center for Health and Gender Equity), David A Broniatowski (Amelia M. Jamison, Kajal S. Parikh, and Adeena Malik are with the Maryland Center for Health Equity, School of Public Health, University of Maryland, College Park. David A. Broniatowski and Michael C. Smith are with the Department of Engineering Management and Systems Engineering, School of Engineering and Applied Science, and Institute for Data, Democracy, and Politics, The George Washington University, Washington, DC. Mark Dredze is with the Department of Computer Science, Whiting School of Engineering...), Michael C Smith (0000-0002-1200-0855, Amelia M. Jamison, Kajal S. Parikh, and Adeena Malik are with the Maryland Center for Health Equity, School of Public Health, University of Maryland, College Park. David A. Broniatowski and Michael C. Smith are with the Department of Engineering Management and Systems Engineering, School of Engineering and Applied Science, and Institute for Data, Democracy, and Politics, The George Washington University, Washington, DC. Mark Dredze is with the Department of Computer Science, Whiting School of Engineering...), Kajal S Parikh (Amelia M. Jamison, Kajal S. Parikh, and Adeena Malik are with the Maryland Center for Health Equity, School of Public Health, University of Maryland, College Park. David A. Broniatowski and Michael C. Smith are with the Department of Engineering Management and Systems Engineering, School of Engineering and Applied Science, and Institute for Data, Democracy, and Politics, The George Washington University, Washington, DC. Mark Dredze is with the Department of Computer Science, Whiting School of Engineering...), Adeena Malik (Amelia M. Jamison, Kajal S. Parikh, and Adeena Malik are with the Maryland Center for Health Equity, School of Public Health, University of Maryland, College Park. David A. Broniatowski and Michael C. Smith are with the Department of Engineering Management and Systems Engineering, School of Engineering and Applied Science, and Institute for Data, Democracy, and Politics, The George Washington University, Washington, DC. Mark Dredze is with the Department of Computer Science, Whiting School of Engineering...), Mark Dredze (0000-0002-0422-2474, Amelia M. Jamison, Kajal S. Parikh, and Adeena Malik are with the Maryland Center for Health Equity, School of Public Health, University of Maryland, College Park. David A. Broniatowski and Michael C. Smith are with the Department of Engineering Management and Systems Engineering, School of Engineering and Applied Science, and Institute for Data, Democracy, and Politics, The George Washington University, Washington, DC. Mark Dredze is with the Department of Computer Science, Whiting School of Engineering...), Sandra C Quinn (0000-0002-3258-4595, Amelia M. Jamison, Kajal S. Parikh, and Adeena Malik are with the Maryland Center for Health Equity, School of Public Health, University of Maryland, College Park. David A. Broniatowski and Michael C. Smith are with the Department of Engineering Management and Systems Engineering, School of Engineering and Applied Science, and Institute for Data, Democracy, and Politics, The George Washington University, Washington, DC. Mark Dredze is with the Department of Computer Science, Whiting School of Engineering...)
Year2020
Volume110
IssueS3
PagesS331-S339
Publication date2020-10-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueAmerican Journal of Public Health (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0090-0036 • E-ISSN: 1541-0048
PublisherAmerican Public Health Association (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.2105/ajph.2020.305940
PMID33001737
OpenAlexW3089905796
LanguageEN
Citations received20
References cited27

Objectives. To adapt and extend an existing typology of vaccine misinformation to classify the major topics of discussion across the total vaccine discourse on Twitter. Methods. Using 1.8 million vaccine-relevant tweets compiled from 2014 to 2017, we adapted an existing typology to Twitter data, first in a manual content analysis and then using latent Dirichlet allocation (LDA) topic modeling to extract 100 topics from the data set. Results. Manual annotation identified 22% of the data set as antivaccine, of which safety concerns and conspiracies were the most common themes. Seventeen percent of content was identified as provaccine, with roughly equal proportions of vaccine promotion, criticizing antivaccine beliefs, and vaccine safety and effectiveness. Of the 100 LDA topics, 48 contained provaccine sentiment and 28 contained antivaccine sentiment, with 9 containing both. Conclusions. Our updated typology successfully combines manual annotation with machine-learning methods to estimate the distribution of vaccine arguments, with greater detail on the most distinctive topics of discussion. With this information, communication efforts can be developed to better promote vaccines and avoid amplifying antivaccine rhetoric on Twitter

Annotation · Information retrieval · Latent Dirichlet allocation · Misinformation · Political science · Promotion (chess) · Set (abstract data type) · Sociology · Topic model · Typology · Artificial Intelligence · Computer Science · Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection · Misinformation and Its Impacts · Psychology · Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy

  • Vaccine Hesitancy

    Open Access•Rina Fajri Nuwarda, Iqbal Ramzan et al.•Vaccines•2022

  • Predicting Health Misperceptions

    Arunima Krishna, James J Cummings et al.•Health Communication•2025

  • A Study of Discourse on Covid-19 Vaccines from Conspiracy Communities on Reddit Using Topic Modeling and Sentiment Analysis

    Chun Zhou, Yuan Zhao et al.•Health Communication•2026

  • Psycholinguistic Markers of Covid-19 Conspiracy Tweets and Predictors of Tweet Dissemination

    A Rain, GONDY LEROY et al.•Health Communication•2023

  • Remembering and forgetting information about the Covid-19 vaccine on Twitter

    Ezgi Bilgin, Qi Wang•Memory•2023

  • Integrating Interpersonal Communication into the Influence of Presumed Media Influence Model

    Jingyuan Shi, Liang Chen et al.•Journal of Broadcasting &…•2022

  • The popularity of contradictory information about Covid-19 vaccine on social media in China

    Open Access•Dandan Wang, Yadong Zhou•Computers in Human Behavior•2022

  • Online vaccine misinformation and susceptible publics

    Open Access•Arunima Krishna, Michelle A Amazeen et al.•Telematics and Informatics•2025

  • Sentimientos hacia la vacunación contra la covid-19

    Open Access•Hector Augusto Rodriguez Orejuela, Claudia Lorena Montes-Mora et al.•Palabra Clave•2022

  • Elected officials’ Online Sharing of Misinformation

    Open Access•Yuehong ‘cassandra’ Tai, Yuehong Cassandra Tai et al.•Political Communication•2026

  • A Construal Level Approach to Anti-Vaccination Discussions

    Chun Zhou•Health Communication•2026

  • Persuasive strategies in online health misinformation

    Wei Peng, Sue Lim et al.•Information Communication & Society•2023

  • Official yet questionable

    Yuehong ‘cassandra’ Tai, Roan Buma et al.•Journal of Information Technology…•2023

  • How do mass shootings shape the social media discourse on guns in the US Congress? Causal discovery and topic modeling

    Open Access•Dmytro Bukhanevych, Rayan Succar et al.•PLOS Global Public Health•2025

  • A taxonomy of anti-vaccination arguments from a systematic literature review and text modelling

    Open Access•Angelo Fasce, Peter Schmid et al.•Nature Human Behaviour•2023

  • In generative AI we trust

    Open Access•Elizaveta Kuznetsova, Mykola Makhortykh et al.•Journal of Computational Social…•2025

  • Fake news virality

    Open Access•C S Hong•Social Science Research•2024

  • Online Conspiracy Groups

    Open Access•H R Greve, H Rao et al.•American Sociological Review•2022

  • [De]Politicizing the Pandemic

    Open Access•Laura Robinson, Juliana Maria Trammel et al.•American Behavioral Scientist•2025

  • Acovmd

    Open Access•Selva Birunda, S Selva Birunda et al.•International Social Science…•2024

  • Opportunities and challenges of Web 2.0 for vaccination decisions

    Open Access•Cornelia Betsch, Noel T Brewer et al.•Vaccine•2012

  • Pandemics in the Age of Twitter

    Open Access•Cynthia Chew, Gunther Eysenbach et al.•PLoS ONE•2010

  • Anti-vaccine activists, Web 2.0, and the postmodern paradigm – An overview of tactics and tropes used online by the anti-vaccination movement

    Open Access•Anna Kata•Vaccine•2012

  • A postmodern Pandora's box

    Open Access•Anna Kata•Vaccine•2010

  • Vaccine hesitancy

    Open Access•Noni E Macdonald•Vaccine•2015

  • Probabilistic topic models

    Open Access•David M Blei•Communications of the ACM•2012

  • Russian Twitter Accounts and the Partisan Polarization of Vaccine Discourse, 2015–2017

    Dror Walter, Yotam Ophir et al.•American Journal of Public Health•2020

  • Toward Real-Time Infoveillance of Twitter Health Messages

    Jason B Colditz, Kar-Hai Chu et al.•American Journal of Public Health•2018

  • Malicious Actors on Twitter

    Amelia M Jamison, David Broniatowski et al.•American Journal of Public Health•2019

  • Weaponized Health Communication

    David Broniatowski, David A Broniatowski et al.•American Journal of Public Health•2018

  • Geographic and demographic correlates of autism-related anti-vaccine beliefs on Twitter, 2009-15

    Open Access•Theodore S Tomeny, C Vargo et al.•Social Science & Medicine•2017

Unique citing works20
Citations per year5
Citation span2022 - 2026 (5)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 20

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae