Getting the Science Right and Doing the Right Science in Vaccine Safety

Bibliographic Data

ID11030080
AuthorsRoger Bernier (Roger Bernier is with the National Immunization Program, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Ga. Karen Midthun is with the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, Washington, DC.), Karen Midthun (Roger Bernier is with the National Immunization Program, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Ga. Karen Midthun is with the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, Washington, DC.)
Year2004
Volume94
Issue6
Pages914-917
Publication date2004-06-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueAmerican Journal of Public Health (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0090-0036 • E-ISSN: 1541-0048
PublisherAmerican Public Health Association (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.2105/ajph.94.6.914
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited1

Because of the potential for conflicts of interest, Salmon et al. propose in this issue the creation of an independent vaccine safety board to assume responsibility for assessing the safety of licensed vaccines. We believe that the current system at the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) facilitates needed interactions between those involved in risk assessment and risk management, provides substantial safeguards against conflicts of interest, and results in sound decisions. The CDC, given its role in promoting immunization, may be perceived to have a greater potential conflict and plans to review its vaccine safety activities. Both agencies recognize the importance of transparency in considering vaccine safety and welcome the opportunity to work with the public and the medical community to improve the quality of scientific information and decisionmaking

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub