The Movement for Universal Health Insurance
Finding Common Ground
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 11032876 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Thomas Bodenheimer (0000-0001-6106-9288, Thomas Bodenheimer is with the Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of California at San Francisco., corresponding author) |
| Year | 2003 |
| Volume | 93 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 112-115 |
| Publication date | 2003-01-01 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | American Journal of Public Health (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0090-0036 • E-ISSN: 1541-0048 |
| Publisher | American Public Health Association (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.2105/ajph.93.1.112 |
| PMID | 12511398 |
| OpenAlex | W1967660241 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 5 |
Before 1971, all proposals for universal health insurance were based on private sector financing and administration. After 1971, universal health insurance plans relying on the private sector complicated efforts of the universal health insurance movement. To forge as broad a movement for universal health insurance as possible, it may be worthwhile for universal health insurance advocates of different persuasions to seek common ground on the basis of a set of goals for a new health care system. The goals can serve as a measuring stick to determine which health insurance plans are worthy of support
Actuarial science · Business · Economic growth · Economics · Health care · Health insurance · Private sector · Self-insurance · Universal coverage · Universal design · Universal health care · Computer Science · Healthcare Policy and Management · Healthcare Systems and Reforms · Primary Care and Health Outcomes · Health Policy
| Highly cited | No |
|---|