Physical Dating Violence Victimization Among Sexual Minority Youth

Bibliographic Data

ID11034201
AuthorsFeijun Luo (0000-0003-2862-7510, Feijun Luo is with the Division of Analysis, Research, and Practice Integration, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA. Deborah M. Stone and Andra T. Tharp are with the Division of Violence Prevention, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.), Deborah M Stone (Feijun Luo is with the Division of Analysis, Research, and Practice Integration, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA. Deborah M. Stone and Andra T. Tharp are with the Division of Violence Prevention, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.), Andra Teten Tharp (National Center for Injury Prevention and Control)
Year2014
Volume104
Issue10
Pagese66-e73
Publication date2014-10-01
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueAmerican Journal of Public Health (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0090-0036 • E-ISSN: 1541-0048
PublisherAmerican Public Health Association (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.2105/ajph.2014.302051
PMID25121813
OpenAlexW2107074975
LanguageEN
Citations received22
References cited29

Objectives. We examined (1) whether sexual minority youths (SMYs) are at increased risk for physical dating violence victimization (PDVV) compared with non-SMYs, (2) whether bisexual youths have greater risk of PDVV than lesbian or gay youths, (3) whether youths who have had sexual contact with both sexes are more susceptible to PDVV than youths with same sex–only sexual contact, and (4) patterns of PDVV among SMYs across demographic groups. Methods. Using 2 measures of sexual orientation, sexual identity and sexual behavior, and compiling data from 9 urban areas that administered the Youth Risk Behavior Surveys from 2001 to 2011, we conducted logistic regression analyses to calculate odds of PDVV among SMYs across demographic sub-samples. Results. SMYs have significantly increased odds of PDVV compared with non-SMYs. Bisexual youths do not have significantly higher odds of PDVV than gay or lesbian youths, but youths who had sexual contact with both-sexes possess significantly higher odds of PDVV than youths with same sex–only sexual contact. These patterns hold for most gender, grade, and racial/ethnic subgroups. Conclusions. Overall, SMYs have greater odds of PDVV versus non-SMYs. Among SMYs, youths who had sexual contact with both sexes have greater odds of PDVV than youths with same sex–only sexual contact. Prevention programs that consider sexual orientation, support tolerance, and teach coping and conflict resolution skills could reduce PDVV among SMYs

Developmental psychology · Ethnic group · Human sexuality · Lesbian · Logistic regression · Odds · Odds ratio · Sexual identity · Sexual minority · Sexual orientation · Sociology · Clinical Psychology · Demography · Gender Studies · Intimate Partner and Family Violence · LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy · Medicine · Psychology · Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies · Social Psychology

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub