Urban–Rural Inequalities in Ischemic Heart Disease in Scotland, 1981–1999

Bibliographic Data

ID11034396
AuthorsKate Levin (0000-0002-7889-3289, Medical Research Council), Kate A Levin (At the time of the study, Kate A. Levin and Alastair H. Leyland were with the Medical Research Council’s Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, University of Glasgow, Scotland.), Alastair H Leyland (0000-0003-3741-7099, At the time of the study, Kate A. Levin and Alastair H. Leyland were with the Medical Research Council’s Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, University of Glasgow, Scotland.)
Year2006
Volume96
Issue1
Pages145-151
Publication date2006-01-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueAmerican Journal of Public Health (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0090-0036 • E-ISSN: 1541-0048
PublisherAmerican Public Health Association (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.2105/ajph.2004.051193
PMID16317212
PMCIDPMC1470443
OpenAlexW2093922490
LanguageEN
Citations received13
References cited26

Objectives. We sought to describe the pattern and magnitude of urban–rural variation in ischemic heart disease (IHD) in Scotland and to examine the associations among IHD health indicators, level of rurality, and degree of socioeconomic deprivation. Methods. We used routine population and health data on the population aged 40–74 years between 1981 and 1999 and living in 826 small areas (average population=5600) in Scotland. Three IHD health indicators—mortality rates (deaths per 100000 population), rates of continuous hospital stays (discharges per 100000 population), and rates of mortality in the hospital or within 28 days of discharge (MH+) were analyzed with multilevel Poisson models. A 4-level rurality classification was used: urban areas, remote small towns, accessible rural areas, and remote rural areas. Results. Rates of mortality, continuous hospital stays, and MH+ increased with area socioeconomic deprivation. After adjustment for population age, gender, and deprivation, the relative risk of IHD mortality in remote rural areas was similar to that of urban areas in 1981; the relative risk of a continuous hospital stay was significantly lower (relative risk [RR] = 0.70; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.64, 0.76) and the relative risk of MH+ was higher (RR=1.18; 95% CI=1.04, 1.35) in remote rural areas. Mortality and MH+ declined for all ruralities over time. However, MH+ remains highest in remote rural areas and remote towns. Conclusions. Low standardized ratios of IHD continuous hospital stays and mortality in remote rural areas mask health problems among rural populations. Although absolute and relative differences between urban and rural rates of MH+ have diminished, the relative risk of MH+ remains high in remote rural areas

Confidence interval · Environmental health · Geography · Mortality rate · Poisson regression · Population · Rate ratio · Relative risk · Rural area · Rurality · Socioeconomic status · Demography · Global Health Workforce Issues · Health disparities and outcomes · Internal Medicine · Medicine · Rural development and sustainability · Surgery

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access