Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Public Health Communication Approaches for Building Common Ground

Bibliographic Data

ID11034517
AuthorsWen-Ying Sylvia Chou (0000-0002-9140-6094, All authors are with the Behavior Research Program, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD. Anna Gaysynsky is also with ICF Next, Rockville, MD.), Irina A Iles (0000-0002-9348-1012, All authors are with the Behavior Research Program, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD. Anna Gaysynsky is also with ICF Next, Rockville, MD.), Anna Gaysynsky (0000-0001-5612-5572, All authors are with the Behavior Research Program, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD. Anna Gaysynsky is also with ICF Next, Rockville, MD.), William M P Klein (0000-0002-8847-8193, All authors are with the Behavior Research Program, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD. Anna Gaysynsky is also with ICF Next, Rockville, MD.)
Year2025
Volume115
Issue4
Pages511-518
Publication date2025-04-01
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueAmerican Journal of Public Health (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0090-0036 • E-ISSN: 1541-0048
PublisherAmerican Public Health Association (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.2105/ajph.2024.308003
PMID39913869
OpenAlexW4407211911
LanguageEN
Citations received2
References cited31

Changes in the information landscape and increasing polarization in society over recent decades have made it more difficult to establish common ground, which poses a profound challenge to effective health communication and public health in general. We highlight the importance of assessing health communication approaches for their potential to bring people together and reduce polarization. We outline several communication approaches that use existing common ground (e.g., appeals to shared values, shared identity, common goals, social norms) or cultivate common ground (e.g., dialogue to bridge divides, trust-focused communication, efforts to humanize scientists), positing that by furthering common ground, these approaches can serve to increase a shared understanding of contentious health topics and foster greater trust in science and evidence-based health information. We end by cautioning against the use of approaches that may be shown to be effective on some measures but may also inadvertently create further polarization, such as the use of certain fear appeals, disparaging humor, or stigmatizing language. ( Am J Public Health. 2025;115(4):511–518. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2024.308003 )

Common ground · Health communication · Internet privacy · Polarization (electrochemistry) · Political science · Public health · Public relations · Sociology · Behavioral Health and Interventions · Climate Change Communication and Perception · Computer Science · Medicine · Misinformation and Its Impacts · Psychology · Social Psychology

  • Differences in Covid-19 vaccine acceptance and uptake according to region of birth

    Open Access•Mariam Hassan, Adam Mitchell et al.•Frontiers in Public Health•2026

  • Empowering Vulnerable Women

    Open Access•Maryam Folarin•Media and Communication•2026

  • The impact of self-affirmation on health-behavior change

    Tracy Epton, Peter R Harris et al.•Health Psychology•2015

  • Crafting Normative Messages to Protect the Environment

    Open Access•Robert B Cialdini•Current Directions in Psychological…•2003

  • Moral reframing

    Open Access•Matthew Feinberg, R Willer•Social and Personality Psychology…•2019

  • A Meta-Analysis of Fear Appeals

    Open Access•Kim Witte, Mike Allen•Health Education & Behavior•2000

  • Toward effective government communication strategies in the era of Covid-19

    Open Access•Bernadette Hyland, John Gardner et al.•Humanities and Social Sciences…•2021

  • How Fear Appeal Approaches in Covid-19 Health Communication May Be Harming the Global Community

    Open Access•Jeni Stolow, Lee Buchsbaum et al.•Health Education & Behavior•2020

  • The Role of Late-Night Infotainment Comedy in Communicating Climate Change Consensus

    Edward J R Clarke, Alexander Klas et al.•Environmental Communication•2022

  • Mass Media

    K Viswanath, Shoba Ramanadhan et al.•Macrosocial Determinants of…•2007

  • A video intervention for every straight man

    Open Access•Sabine Preuß, Melanie Steffens•Group Processes & Intergroup…•2020

  • Using intercultural videos of direct contact to implement vicarious contact

    Open Access•Loris Vezzali, Gian Antonio Di Bernardo et al.•Group Processes & Intergroup…•2018

  • Anti-intellectualism and the mass public’s response to the Covid-19 pandemic

    Open Access•Eric Merkley, Peter John Loewen•Nature Human Behaviour•2021

  • Americans, Not Partisans

    Matthew S Levendusky, Matthew Levendusky•The Journal of Politics•2018

  • Priming Norms to Combat Affective Polarization

    Open Access•Kevin J Mullinix, Trent J Lythgoe et al.•Political Research Quarterly•2023

  • Terror, Terror Everywhere? How Terrorism News Shape Support for Anti‐Muslim Policies as a Function of Perceived Threat Severity and Controllability

    Open Access•Jörg Matthes, Desirée Schmuck et al.•Political Psychology•2019

  • Cultural cognition of scientific consensus

    Dan M Kahan, Hank C Jenkins‐smith et al.•Journal of Risk Research•2010

  • Social Consequences of Disparagement Humor

    Open Access•Thomas E Ford, Michael A Ferguson et al.•Personality and Social Psychology…•2004

  • Good Karen, Bad Karen

    Open Access•Miranda J Brady, Erika Christiansen et al.•Journal of Gender Studies•2023

  • A Priest, a Rabbi, and a Minister Walk into a Bar

    Open Access•Nathan Walter, Michael J Cody et al.•Human Communication Research•2018

Citations per year2
Citation span2026 - 2026 (1)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae