Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) in the 1980s

Bibliographic Data

ID11035095
AuthorsP J Placek, S M Taffel
Year1988
Volume78
Issue5
Pages512-515
Publication date1988-05-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueAmerican Journal of Public Health (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0090-0036 • E-ISSN: 1541-0048
PublisherAmerican Public Health Association (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.2105/ajph.78.5.512
LanguageEN
Citations received6
References cited12

The incidence of vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) and characteristics of VBAC births are investigated using 1980-85 National Hospital Discharge Survey Data collected by the National Center for Health Statistics. Only 3.4 per cent of mothers with previous cesarean delivery had VBAC in their subsequent 1980 delivery; this increased to 6.6 per cent in 1985. Because VBAC is a relatively infrequent event, 1980-85 data were combined and indicate that in this period 4.9 per cent of mothers with previous cesarean had a vaginal birth in their subsequent delivery. Combined 1980-85 VBAC rates are under 10 per cent for all age, race, marital status, region, hospital size, hospital ownership, and expected source of payment groups. Between 1980 and 1985, over 1.4 million repeat cesareans were performed for mothers having a live birth. Evidence suggests that potentially over 500,000 of these repeat cesareans could have been VBACs (over and above the 74,000 VBACs which occurred). VBAC mothers' mean length of hospital stay is 3.2 days, which compares closely with 3.0 days for other vaginal deliveries, but both contrast sharply with 5.6 days for repeat cesareans and 6.0 days for primary cesareans. Except for the uterine scar from the previous cesarean, VBAC mothers appear to have about the same history and frequency of complications as mothers with other vaginal deliveries. If the 500,000 repeat cesareans had been VBACs, surgical fees and costs for 1.2 million days of hospital stay would have been averted over the 1980-85 period

  • C-sections rise; VBACs inch upward

    Paul J Placek, S M Taffel et al.•American Journal of Public Health•1988

  • Factors influencing the practice of vaginal birth after cesarean section

    G Goldman, Raynald Pineault et al.•American Journal of Public Health•1993

  • Cesarean section use and source of payment

    Randall S Stafford•American Journal of Public Health•1990

  • Relationship Between Malpractice Litigation Pressure and Rates of Cesarean Section and Vaginal Birth After Cesarean Section

    Ya-Ting Yang, Y Tony Yang et al.•Medical Care•2009

  • Experiment and illusion in reproductive medicine

    Open Access•Jeanne Guillemin•Human Nature•1994

  • The making of a medical tradition

    Open Access•Carol Shepherd Mcclain•Social Science & Medicine•1990

  • Cesarean rate increases in 1985

    Paul J Placek, S M Taffel et al.•American Journal of Public Health•1987

  • Trends in the United States cesarean section rate and reasons for the 1980-85 rise

    S M Taffel, Paul J Placek et al.•American Journal of Public Health•1987

Unique citing works6
Citations per year0,16
Citation span1988 - 2009 (22)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 6

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae