Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Medical technology assessment and practice guidelines

Their day in court

Bibliographic Data

ID11035197
AuthorsGerald F Anderson (0000-0003-1845-1523, Johns Hopkins University), Mark A Hall (0000-0001-6118-5609, Hampton University), Earl P Steinberg
Year1993
Volume83
Issue11
Pages1635-1639
Publication date1993-11-01
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueAmerican Journal of Public Health (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0090-0036 • E-ISSN: 1541-0048
PublisherAmerican Public Health Association (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.2105/ajph.83.11.1635
PMID8238696
OpenAlexW2162484918
LanguageEN
Citations received5
References cited10

There is the expectation that outcomes research and the promulgation of medical practice guidelines will be able to identify and hopefully reduce the amount of unnecessary or inappropriate medical care through a variety of methods, including utilization review. However, past efforts by public and private insurers to deny claims on the basis of formal technology assessments or practice guidelines have frequently been overturned by the courts for multifarious reasons. This paper examines the court's reluctance to accept a variety of technology assessment methods in coverage policy decisions. The paper reviews the options that have been proposed to restrict judicial involvement in the formulation of coverage policy and then proposes a new option that employs a more precise taxonomy of medical practice assessment

Actuarial science · Business · Family medicine · Federal court · Health care · Health technology · Medical care · Medical education · Medical practice · Political science · Promulgation · Supreme court · Technology assessment · Variety (cybernetics) · Computer Science · Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life · Healthcare cost, quality, practices · Healthcare Policy and Management · Law · Medicine

  • Avaliação tecnológica e análise custo-efetividade em saúde

    Open Access•Letícia Krauss Silva•Ciência & Saúde Coletiva•2003

  • When Courts Review Medical Appropriateness

    Gerald F Anderson, Gerard Anderson et al.•Medical Care•1998

  • Patients' rights after health care reform

    Wendy K Mariner•American Journal of Public Health•1994

  • Medical Technology in the United States and Canada

    Diane M Dewar•Review of Social Economy•1997

  • Technology Coverage Decisions by Health Care Plans and Considerations by Medical Directors

    Claudia Steiner, Claudia A Steiner et al.•Medical Care•1997

  • Physician ratings of appropriate indications for three procedures

    R E Park, Arlene Fink et al.•American Journal of Public Health•1989

  • Reimbursing New Technologies

    Richard S Saver•Stanford Law Review•1992

Citations per year0.16
Citation span1994 - 2003 (10)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae