Tick testing as a method of controlling Rocky Mountain spotted fever
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 11035774 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Jeffrey J Sacks, T A Pinner, R L Parker |
| Year | 1983 |
| Volume | 73 |
| Issue | 8 |
| Pages | 903-906 |
| Publication date | 1983-08-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | American Journal of Public Health (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0090-0036 • E-ISSN: 1541-0048 |
| Publisher | American Public Health Association (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.2105/ajph.73.8.903 |
| PMID | 6869643 |
| OpenAlex | W2060138036 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 6 |
In South Carolina, 1974-1980, only two matches were found between 536 Rocky Mountain spotted fever (RMSF) cases and 965 individuals who submitted ticks that tested rickettsial antigen positive. In neither case did the positive test prevent RMSF. Tick rickettsial positivity rates varied inversely with human RMSF attack rates in different geographic areas. A physician survey established it as unlikely that RMSF occurred in positive tick submitters (PTS), and that although not recommended, 34 per cent of asymptomatic PTS received prophylactic treatment. Only 18 per cent of positive ticks were engorged. Tick testing appears ineffective in preventing RMSF
Asymptomatic · Biology · Rickettsia · Rickettsiosis · Rocky Mountain spotted fever · Spotted fever · Tick · Tick-borne disease · Veterinary medicine · Immunology · Internal Medicine · Medicine · Vector-Borne Animal Diseases · Vector-borne infectious diseases · Viral Infections and Vectors · Virology
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |