Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Norplant selection and satisfaction among low-income women

Bibliographic Data

ID11035786
AuthorsLynda Clarke (University of Florida Health), L L Clarke, K Schmitt, Karen M Schmitt (0000-0003-3646-6323), Christine A Bono, J Steele (0000-0002-8642-8985), Jeanne R Steele, Melissa K Miller (0000-0002-8672-4944)
Year1998
Volume88
Issue8
Pages1175-1181
Publication date1998-08-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueAmerican Journal of Public Health (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0090-0036 • E-ISSN: 1541-0048
PublisherAmerican Public Health Association (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.2105/ajph.88.8.1175
PMID9702143
OpenAlexW2064791607
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited22

OBJECTIVES: This study examined correlates of Norplant selection and satisfaction among low-income women. METHODS: Interviews were completed in family planning clinics in 4 Florida counties with 1152 Norplant users and 1268 nonusers, with follow-up interviews with a subsample up to 1 year later. Logistic regression models estimated the associations of socio-demographic and medical characteristics with Norplant selection and method satisfaction. RESULTS: Odds ratios for Norplant selection were significantly greater among women who planned to have children in 5 or more years, those who were "offered" Norplant, those who lived in Palm Beach County, those who were using drugs, and those who were Medicaid clients. Women younger than 17 and those who learned about Norplant from a friend were twice as likely as others to select Norplant. Ninety-two percent of Norplant users were satisfied with the method; women with side effects and those who felt pressure to select a method were significantly less likely than others to be satisfied. CONCLUSIONS: Norplant provides an acceptable and satisfying method of birth control for many low-income women. Proper counseling about all methods of birth control and about Norplant's side effects remains critical to the appropriate delivery of this method

Birth control · Environmental health · Family medicine · Family planning · Logistic regression · Odds · Odds ratio · Population · Research methodology · Child Welfare and Adoption · Demography · Medicine · Reproductive Health and Contraception · Reproductive Health and Technologies

  • Hormonal Contraceptive Use and Discontinuation Because of Dissatisfaction

    Open Access•Krystale E Littlejohn•Demography•2012

  • Sample Selection Bias as a Specification Error

    James J Heckman•Econometrica•1979

  • Coercion and Long-Term Contraceptives

    Bonnie Steinbock•The Hastings Center Report•1995

  • Limited-dependent and qualitative variables in econometrics

    G S Maddala•Limited-Dependent and Qualitative…•1983

  • The economic value of contraception

    James Trussell, Joseph A Leveque et al.•American Journal of Public Health•1995

  • Topics for our times

    Andrew R Davidson, Debra Kalmuss•American Journal of Public Health•1997

  • Does Choice Make a Difference to Contraceptive Use? Evidence from East Java

    Siti Pariani, David M Heer et al.•Studies in Family Planning•1991

  • Acceptance and Perceptions of NORPLANT Among Users in San Francisco, USA

    Philip D Darney, Elizabeth Atkinson et al.•Studies in Family Planning•1990

  • International Experience with NORPLANT and NORPLANT-2 Contraceptives

    Irving Sivin•Studies in Family Planning•1988

  • Assessing the Acceptability of NORPLANT Implants in Four Countries

    Margot Zimmerman, Margot L Zimmerman et al.•Studies in Family Planning•1990

Unique citing works1
Citations per year0,07
Citation span2012 - 2012 (1)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 1

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae