Assessing Proposals for New Global Health Treaties
An Analytic Framework
Bibliographic Data
We have presented an analytic framework and 4 criteria for assessing when global health treaties have reasonable prospects of yielding net positive effects. First, there must be a significant transnational dimension to the problem being addressed. Second, the goals should justify the coercive nature of treaties. Third, proposed global health treaties should have a reasonable chance of achieving benefits. Fourth, treaties should be the best commitment mechanism among the many competing alternatives. Applying this analytic framework to 9 recent calls for new global health treaties revealed that none fully meet the 4 criteria. Efforts aiming to better use or revise existing international instruments may be more productive than is advocating new treaties
Dimension (graph theory) · Economics · Global health · Health care · International law · Law and economics · Political science · Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology · Global Security and Public Health · Health and Conflict Studies · Law · Mathematics
The Global Syndemic of Obesity, Undernutrition, and Climate Change
Making the public protect public health
Bridging the commitment-compliance gap in global health politics
Empirically evaluating the WHO global code of practice on the international recruitment of health personnel’s impact on four high-income countries four years after adoption
Navigating institutional complexity in the health sector
Delays in Global Disease Outbreak Responses
Governing the Commons
Antibiotic resistance—the need for global solutions
Beyond Markets and States
Mobilizing for Human Rights
Empirical impact evaluation of the WHO Global Code of Practice on the International Recruitment of Health Personnel in Australia, Canada, UK and USA
Globalisation of tobacco industry influence and new global responses
Assessing the Expected Impact of Global Health Treaties
| Citations per year | 0.6 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2016 - 2026 (11) |
| Highly cited | No |