Interorganizational Network Structures and Diffusion of Information Through a Health System
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 11039730 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Deborah E Gibbons (0000-0002-7211-1549, Deborah E. Gibbons is with the Graduate School of Business and Public Policy, Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey, Calif., autor de correspondencia) |
| Año | 2007 |
| Volumen | 97 |
| Número | 9 |
| Páginas | 1684-1692 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2007-09-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | No |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | American Journal of Public Health (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 0090-0036 • E-ISSN: 1541-0048 |
| Editorial | American Public Health Association (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.2105/ajph.2005.063669 |
| PMID | 17329666 |
| PMCID | PMC1963276 |
| OpenAlex | W2040041806 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 9 |
| Referencias citadas | 23 |
Objectives. I used computational models to test the relationship between interorganizational network structures and diffusion of moderate- to high-priority health information throughout a system. I examined diffusion effects of mean and variance in organizational partnering tendencies, arrangement of ties among subgroups of the system, and the diffusing organization’s effective network size. Methods. I used agent-based models to simulate local information-sharing processes and observe the outcomes of system-level diffusion. Graphs of diffusion curves demonstrated differences among intergroup structures, and regression models were used to test effects of parameterized and emergent network variables on diffusion. Results. The average tendency of participating organizations to engage in partnerships with other network members influenced diffusion of information, but variance in partnering tendencies had little effect. Fully connected subgroup structures outperformed hierarchical connections among subgroups, and all outperformed group-to-group chains. Introduction of a small proportion of randomness in connections among members of the chain structure improved diffusion without increasing network density. Finally, greater effective size in the diffusing organization’s network increased diffusion of information. Conclusions. Small interventions that build connecting structures among subgroups within a health system can be particularly effective at facilitating natural dissemination of information
Business · Diffusion · Diffusion of innovations · Knowledge management · Multilevel model · Network structure · Randomness · Statistics · Test (biology) · Variance (accounting) · Community Health and Development · Computer Science · Health disparities and outcomes · Healthcare Systems and Technology · Marketing · Mathematics · Psychology · Theoretical Computer Science
Interorganizational Network Changes Among Health Organizations in the Brazos Valley, Texas
Implementing a Care Pathway for Complex Chronic Patients from a Nursing Perspective
The Structure and Effectiveness of Health Systems
Core-periphery or decentralized? Topological shifts of specialized information on Twitter
How does central-local policy implementation deviation affect urban residents’ green consumption behavior? A multi-agent simulation considering environmental awareness and social interaction
Social Network Analysis of Patient Sharing Among Hospitals in Orange County, California
Dynamic Interplay Among Homeostatic, Hedonic, and Cognitive Feedback Circuits Regulating Body Weight
The Structure of Critical Care Transfer Networks
Quality of Care and Interhospital Collaboration
Emergence of Scaling in Random Networks
Social Structure and Alliance Formation Patterns
Informal Networks and Organizational Crises
A Transactional Approach to Organizing Efficiency
Structure and change in child mental health service delivery networks
Structural constraints on communication
Choice behavior in social dilemmas
Structural Holes
The Strength of Weak Ties
Birds of a Feather
Locating the Community Field
Network Dynamics and Field Evolution
Networks, Dynamics, and the Small-World Phenomenon
| Obras citantes distintas | 9 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 0,53 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2009 - 2025 (17) |
| Velocidad de citación | recent |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 9 |