Content validation of a quantitative stakeholder engagement measure
Bibliographic Data
AIM: Using a stakeholder-engaged approach, this study conducted content validation and item reduction of a quantitative measure of research engagement. METHODS: A five-round modified Delphi process was used to reach consensus on items. Rounds 1-3 and 5 were conducted using web-based surveys. Round 4 consisted of a 2-day, in-person meeting. Delphi panelists received individualized reports outlining individual and aggregate group responses after rounds 1-3. RESULTS: Over the five-round process, items were added, dropped, modified, and moved from one engagement principle to another. The number of items was reduced from 48 to 32, with three to five items corresponding to eight engagement principles. CONCLUSIONS: Research that develops standardized, reliable, and accurate measures to assess stakeholder engagement is essential to understanding the impact of engagement on scientific discovery and the scientific process. Valid quantitative measures to assess stakeholder engagement in research are necessary to assess associations between engagement and research outcomes.
Delphi · Delphi method · Political science · Process (computing) · Public relations · Stakeholder · Stakeholder engagement · Computer Science · Delphi Technique in Research · Health Policy Implementation Science · Meta-analysis and systematic reviews · Psychology
Using ethnographic approaches to document, evaluate, and facilitate virtual community-engaged implementation research
Development and Validation of a Brief Version of the Research Engagement Survey Tool
Evaluating a community academic partnership to advance equity-focused cancer genetic implementation research
‘I don’t know what we should have done differently’
Si‐cbpar
The design and validation of the Mental Health in Schools Questionnaire (MHISQ)
Shortening and validation of the Patient Engagement In Research Scale (Peirs) for measuring meaningful patient and family caregiver engagement
Human-centered Evaluation and Assessment for Resilience (Hear)
Pragmatic Considerations in Incorporating Stakeholder Engagement Into a Palliative Care Transitions Study
Black Measurement
A Systematic Review of Community‐Based Participatory Research to Enhance Clinical Trials in Racial and Ethnic Minority Groups
The science of stakeholder engagement in research
Delphi
Community Coalitions for Prevention and Health Promotion
Theory and applications of the Delphi technique
Enhancing rigour in the Delphi technique research
An Exploration of the Effect of Community Engagement in Research on Perceived Outcomes of Partnered Mental Health Services Projects
Patient and public engagement in research and health system decision making
Applying the balanced scorecard to local public health performance measurement
Community Engagement in Research
Measuring Community-Based Participatory Research Partnerships
Community-Researcher Partnerships at Niaid HIV/Aids Clinical Trials Sites
Translating Community-Based Participatory Research Principles Into Practice
Defining and Measuring Community Engagement and Community-Engaged Research
Translating Community-Based Participatory Research Principles Into Practice
A Tale of Two Community Networks Program Centers
Evaluating Community Engagement in Research
| Unique citing works | 10 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 2 |
| Citation span | 2021 - 2026 (6) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 10 |