Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The Permiak question”

Bolshevik central authorities, Russian and non-Russian provincial elites negotiating over autonomy in the early 1920s

Bibliographic Data

ID11046202
AuthorsIndrek Jääts (0009-0002-4331-3034, Estonian National Museum, corresponding author)
Year2012
Volume40
Issue2
Pages241-257
Publication date2012-03-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueNationalities Papers (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0090-5992 • E-ISSN: 1465-3923
PublisherCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1080/00905992.2011.652607
OpenAlexW2123144845
LanguageEN
Citations received5
References cited8

This is an article on Bolshevik nationalities policy and ethnic engineering, asking who, in fact, decided which populations belonged together as ethnic groups ( narodnost' ) and thus had the right of national self-determination, and how the level of autonomy was determined for each ethnic unit. Scholars have dealt with Russian and Soviet nationalities issues for decades already, but they have turned their attention mainly to the larger nationalities (at the level of SSR, and to a lesser degree the levels of ASSR and autonomous oblast ). I argue that the lower levels of national territorial autonomy in the Soviet Union (national okrug, raion, volost' , and selsovet ) are worthy of greater academic attention, at least from the ethnological point of view. Having this kind of low-level territorial autonomy has often been a question of to be or not to be for the small ethnic groups concerned, and hence the subject is connected with the question of preservation of cultural and linguistic diversity in Russia

Autonomy · Cultural diversity · Diversity (politics · Ethnic group · Negotiation · Political science · Politics · Sociology · Soviet union · Subject (documents · Eastern European Communism and Reforms · Gender Studies · Historical Geopolitical and Social Dynamics · Law · Soviet and Russian History

  • In the History of Discussions about the Establishment of the Komi-Permyatsky District

    Open Access•Mikhail S Kamenskikh•RUDN Journal of Russian History•2020

  • Negotiating with Khrushchev’s Moscow

    Open Access•Michael Loader, Jeremy Smith•Europe Asia Studies•2025

  • The ‘Mingrelian Question’

    Timothy K Blauvelt, Timothy Blauvelt•Europe Asia Studies•2014

  • Was There a Soviet Nationality Policy

    Jeremy Smith•Europe Asia Studies•2019

  • The Battle for Language

    Open Access•Jeremy Smith•Slavic Review•2017

  • Polnoe sobranie sochineniĭ

    Aleksandr Ivanovich Vvedenskiĭ•Polnoe sobranie sochineniĭ•1980

  • The Affirmative Action Empire

    Terry Martin•Affirmative Action Empire•2018

  • The Bolsheviks and the National Question, 1917–23

    Open Access•Jeremy Smith•Bolsheviks and the National…•1999

  • Building a State in a State

    Open Access•Indrek Jääts•Anthropological Journal of…•2009

  • The Great Challenge

    Open Access•Mark Von Hagen•Slavic Review•1994

  • The Komi, Ethnic Stereotypes, and Nationalities Policy in Late Imperial Russia

    Open Access•Indrek Jääts•The Russian Review•2009

  • The Great Challenge

    Robert Legvold, Hélène Carrère D’encausse et al.•Foreign Affairs•1992

  • The USSR as a Communal Apartment, or How a Socialist State Promoted Ethnic Particularism

    Open Access•Yuri Slezkine•Slavic Review•1994

Unique citing works5
Citations per year0,42
Citation span2014 - 2025 (12)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 5

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae