Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Constitutional Reform and Regional Politics in Kazakstan

Bibliographic Data

ID11047358
AuthorsAzhar Kusainova, A K Kusainova (corresponding author), Gregory Gleason (University of New Mexico)
Year1998
Volume26
Issue3
Pages531-544
Publication date1998-09-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueNationalities Papers (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0090-5992 • E-ISSN: 1465-3923
PublisherCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1080/00905999808408581
OpenAlexW2259347684
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited5

The fate of democracy in Kazakstan may well depend less upon decisions taken in Kazakstan's capital, Almaty (the capital is now Aqmola), than upon what takes place in Kazakstan's far-flung and disparate regions. This should come as no surprise to anyone who appreciates the history and complexities of democratic development. The history of democracy is a history of bottom-up initiative. The democratic institutions that are the most successful and enduring are those that originate from the common and everyday interests and concerns of citizens. Even in historical cases where the political institutions of democracy were adopted consciously and deliberately to break with authoritarian tradition, democracy has been closely associated with local control, self-governance, public participation, and citizen empowerment. The fate of Kazakstan's constitutional order, on the other hand, depends almost exclusively upon decisions taken at the “center” of the new Kazakstan government. The establishment of a constitutional order is a highly conscious and deliberate process. It is also a highly political undertaking. To what extent has the democratic process in Kazakstan corresponded to the process of the establishment of a constitutional order in Kazakstan? To what extent has constitutional development supported limited, accountable government based on popular sovereignty? To what extent can democratic process and constitutional development be expected to mutually reinforce one another in Kazakstan's future? The answers to these questions have great importance for the development of democracy in Kazakstan. They have great importance for the efforts of the international community to encourage democratic development in Kazakstan. These are the key questions of this article

Authoritarianism · Democracy · Government (linguistics · Political capital · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Sociology · Sovereignty · Cuban History and Society · Law · Politics and Conflicts in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Middle East · Public Administration

  • Logiques et acteurs du présidentialisme au Kazakhstan La « Famille », les technocrates et les oligarques

    Sébastien Peyrouse•Revue d’études comparatives…•2008

  • Soviet Central Asia

    Catharine V Ewing, William Fierman•The Russian Review•1992

  • Toward Open Societies

    George Soros•Foreign Policy•1995

  • Assessing Democracy Assistance

    Robert Legvold, Thomas Carothers•Foreign Affairs•1996

  • The Federal Formula and the Collapse of the USSR

    Gregory Gleason•Publius The Journal of Federalism•1992

Unique citing works1
Citations per year0,06
Citation span2008 - 2008 (1)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 1

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae