Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Imagining Kyrgyzstan's nationhood and statehood

Reactions to the 2010 Osh violence

Bibliographic Data

ID11047446
AuthorsCai Wilkinson (0000-0002-8702-750X, Deakin University, corresponding author)
Year2015
Volume43
Issue3
Pages417-436
Publication date2015-05-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueNationalities Papers (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0090-5992 • E-ISSN: 1465-3923
PublisherCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1080/00905992.2014.961127
OpenAlexW2046419512
LanguageEN
Citations received4
References cited26

This article explores the tensions inherent in how Kyrgyzstan's nationhood and statehood have been imagined and practised via an analysis of local reactions to the findings of the Kyrgyzstan Inquiry Commission's (KIC) investigation into the 2010 Osh violence and in particular the threat narrative that developed in opposition to the investigation. In the wake of the clashes that erupted in Osh in June 2010, a recurrent theme was calls from the international community for an independent investigation. Within Kyrgyzstan, however, some politicians argued that investigations violated the republic's sovereignty. Despite local reluctance, a number of investigations did subsequently take place. Yet the reports of the respective investigations did little to quell controversy, with the KIC report being strongly criticized and declared a threat to national security. The strength of feeling demonstrated by this reaction was indicative of long-standing and unresolved tensions in Kyrgyzstan between international and local imaginings of nationhood and statehood. The article concludes by arguing that nationhood and statehood need to be reimagined to focus on reestablishing state-society relations by both local and international actors in order for Kyrgyzstan to begin repairing the already fragile sociopolitical relationships that were grievously damaged by the violence and the subsequent investigations

Criminology · International relations · Narrative · Opposition (politics · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Sociology · Sovereignty · China's Ethnic Minorities and Relations · Gender Studies · Law · Political Conflict and Governance · Soviet and Russian History

  • Territorial Belonging and Homeland Disjuncture

    Kristoffer Michael Rees, Nora Webb Williams et al.•Europe Asia Studies•2021

  • Kyrgyzstan’s informal settlements

    Bert Cramer, Bert R Cramer•Central Asian Survey•2018

  • Model Minorities and Fifth Columns in Service of Nation-Building

    Open Access•Olga Talal•Nationalities Papers•2025

  • Public Reactions to International Legal Institutions

    Terry L Chapman, Terrence L Chapman et al.•The Journal of Politics•2020

  • The Idea of Nationalism

    Hans Kohn•The Idea of Nationalism•2005

  • The State as Investment Market

    Johan Engvall•State As Investment Market•2016

  • Universal Human Rights in Theory and Practice

    Jack Donnelly•Universal Human Rights in Theory…•2013

  • Sovereignty

    Stephen D Krasner•Sovereignty•1999

  • Nationalising states’ or nation‐building? a critical review of the theoretical literature and empirical evidence

    Open Access•Taras Kuzio•Nations and Nationalism•2001

  • The Invention of Legitimacy

    Asel Murzakulova, John Schoeberlein•Europe Asia Studies•2009

  • The Political Economy of Post-Communist Development

    Open Access•Björn Hettne•European Journal of Development…•1994

  • Human rights and the social construction of sovereignty

    Open Access•Christian Reus-Smit•Review of International Studies•2001

  • Fear of democracy or revolution

    Fiona Hill, Kevin Jones et al.•The Washington Quarterly•2006

  • Nationalism and the Marketplace of Ideas

    Jack Snyder, Karen Ballentine•International Security•1996

  • State Building, Security and Development

    Heather Marquette, Danielle Beswick•Third World Quarterly•2011

  • Kyrgyzstan between democratization and ethnic intolerance

    Open Access•Andrew Wachtel, Andrew Baruch Wachtel•Nationalities Papers•2013

  • Nationalizing states in the old ‘New Europe’ – and the new

    Rogers Brubaker•Ethnic and Racial Studies•1996

  • Nation-State Building in Kyrgyzstan and Transition to the Parliamentary System

    Ismail Aydıngün, I Ayd ngun et al.•Parliamentary Affairs•2012

  • The End of the Transition Paradigm

    Open Access•Thomas Carothers•Journal of democracy•2002

  • The State of the Art on the Art of State Building

    Michael Wesley•Global Governance A Review of…•2008

  • The paradigm of nationalism in Kyrgyzstan. Evolving narrative, the sovereignty issue, and political agenda

    Open Access•Marlène Laruelle•Communist and Post-Communist…•2012

  • State Failure, State Collapse, and State Reconstruction

    Open Access•Jennifer Milliken, Keith Krause•Development and Change•2002

  • Moving out of Moscow's orbit

    Anthony Hyman, Anthony A Hyman•International Affairs•1993

  • Central Asia's Catapult to Independence

    Martha Brill Olcott•Foreign Affairs•1992

  • The myth of the civic state

    Taras Kuzio•Ethnic and Racial Studies•2002

  • Forget the `nation`

    Tishkov, Valery A Tishkov•Ethnic and Racial Studies•2000

  • The myth of the 'modern nation' and the myths of nations

    Anthony D Smith•Ethnic and Racial Studies•1988

Unique citing works4
Citations per year0,5
Citation span2018 - 2025 (8)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 4

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae