Renegotiating the empire, forging the nation-state
The Georgian case through the political economic thought of Niko Nikoladze and Noe Zhordania, c. 1870-1920
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 11047644 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Adrian Brisku (0000-0002-5691-1220, Charles University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2016 |
| Volume | 44 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 299-318 |
| Publication date | 2016-03-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Nationalities Papers (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0090-5992 • E-ISSN: 1465-3923 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1080/00905992.2015.1102214 |
| OpenAlex | W2175592919 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 6 |
| References cited | 11 |
This article begins with an observation of a contemporary and yet reoccurring political dilemma that small nation-states face with respect to larger states in being either inside or outside of supranational political entities regarding political and economic asymmetries. Employing an intellectual history approach, the article explores this dilemma with reference to the Georgian nation in late-nineteenth century Tsarist Russia and the early twentieth century, when that territory briefly became a nation-state: It explores this through the language of political economy articulated in the thoughts and actions of two founding Georgian national intellectual and political figures, the statesman Niko Nikoladze and Noe Zhordania, who was one of the first prime ministers. It argues that conceiving of the nation(state) primarily in economic terms, as opposed to exclusively nationalist ones, was more conducive to the option of remaining inside a supranational space
Dilemma · Economic history · Empire · Face (sociological concept · Georgian · Nationalism · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Social science · Sociology · State (computer science · History · Law · Philosophy · Religion and Society Interactions
Ilia Chavchavadze and the emergence of Georgian national discourse
Representing fateful events and imagining territorial integrity in Georgia
The Transcaucasian Democratic Federative Republic (TDFR) as a “Georgian” responsibility
Collective memory and reputational politics of national heroes and villains
Renegotiating the empire, forging the nation (-state)
Renegotiating the Empire, Forging the Nation-State
| Citations per year | 0.67 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2017 - 2022 (6) |
| Highly cited | No |