The Ideological Sources of Wittgenstein's Ethics
Reply to Levi
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 11049511 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Ulrich Steinvorth (corresponding author) |
| Year | 1979 |
| Volume | 1979 |
| Issue | 41 |
| Pages | 166-172 |
| Publication date | 1979-10-01 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Telos (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0090-6514 • E-ISSN: 1940-459X |
| Publisher | Telos Press (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.3817/0979041166 |
| OpenAlex | W2327465494 |
| Language | EN |
Levi has argued that there are two enigmas in Wittgenstein's work and life that can only be explained by his sense of guilt caused by his homosexuality. Enigma 1 is why Wittgenstein advocated a transnatural, two-world ethics; enigma 2, why he accused himself to be a swine in the Engelmann letters. Presented this way, Levi gives little offense or reason for criticism. In particular his solution for the enigma of Wittgenstein's self-accusations seems quite plausible. In spite of all irrationality we might ascribe to Wittgenstein it would have been too irrational even for him to accuse himself of being a swine because of despair of the failure to make the Tractatus understood, as Rudebush and Berg suppose
Art · Criticism · Epistemology · Ideology · Irrational number · Irrationality · Literature · Political science · Politics · Psychoanalysis · Rationality · Reflexive pronoun · Law · Mathematics · Philosophy · Psychology · Wittgensteinian philosophy and applications
| Highly cited | No |
|---|