Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The Third Munich

Bibliographic Data

ID11049522
AuthorsK Kosik, Kenneth S Kosik (0000-0003-3224-5179, corresponding author)
Year1992
Volume1992
Issue94
Pages145-154
Publication date1992-01-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueTelos (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0090-6514 • E-ISSN: 1940-459X
PublisherTelos Press (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.3817/1293094145
OpenAlexW2032140309
LanguageEN

Czechoslovakia has broken down. Yet many Czech commentators are buying, praising, and even reading Ferdinand Peroutka's classic work on the Czechoslovak state. This is unsettling. Was the break-up unavoidable after 1989? Was it a kind of natural catastrophe that could have been avoided? Or was it the result of conscious action? §1 Czechoslovakia was founded in 1918 as a renewal of the Czech state. “The Czechs have a historical right to an independent state of their own making. Moreover, they have a natural and historic right to be affiliated with Slovakia.” In 1918 the Czechs took it for granted that Slovakia would become part of their renewed state: Czechoslovakia. This founding act and the reasoning behind it contains an equivocation never clarified

Archaeology · Czech · Epistemology · Equivocation · Linguistics · Natural (archaeology · Political science · State (computer science · Eastern European Communism and Reforms · European history and politics · Historical Geopolitical and Social Dynamics · History · Law · Philosophy

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae