The Third Munich
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 11049522 |
|---|---|
| Authors | K Kosik, Kenneth S Kosik (0000-0003-3224-5179, corresponding author) |
| Year | 1992 |
| Volume | 1992 |
| Issue | 94 |
| Pages | 145-154 |
| Publication date | 1992-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Telos (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0090-6514 • E-ISSN: 1940-459X |
| Publisher | Telos Press (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.3817/1293094145 |
| OpenAlex | W2032140309 |
| Language | EN |
Czechoslovakia has broken down. Yet many Czech commentators are buying, praising, and even reading Ferdinand Peroutka's classic work on the Czechoslovak state. This is unsettling. Was the break-up unavoidable after 1989? Was it a kind of natural catastrophe that could have been avoided? Or was it the result of conscious action? §1 Czechoslovakia was founded in 1918 as a renewal of the Czech state. “The Czechs have a historical right to an independent state of their own making. Moreover, they have a natural and historic right to be affiliated with Slovakia.” In 1918 the Czechs took it for granted that Slovakia would become part of their renewed state: Czechoslovakia. This founding act and the reasoning behind it contains an equivocation never clarified
Archaeology · Czech · Epistemology · Equivocation · Linguistics · Natural (archaeology · Political science · State (computer science · Eastern European Communism and Reforms · European history and politics · Historical Geopolitical and Social Dynamics · History · Law · Philosophy
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |