Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Kantian Democracy

Interdependence, Legitimacy, and Progress

Bibliographic Data

ID11049670
AuthorsAfsoun Afsahi (0000-0002-1397-925X, corresponding author)
Year2019
Volume2019
Issue188
Pages173-198
Publication date2019-01-01
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueTelos (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0090-6514 • E-ISSN: 1940-459X
PublisherTelos Press (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.3817/0919188173
OpenAlexW2973053059
LanguageEN

Situating Immanuel Kant within the discipline of political theory is not an easy task. While it would be a mistake to assume that Kant's philosophy is devoid of political insights, there is no one clear text that can be singled out as outlining Kant's political philosophy. Hannah Arendt, in fact, has argued that in many ways Kant's political philosophy is unwritten and even nonexistent.1 According to Arendt, Kant misunderstood his own contribution to political philosophy, which, in her opinion, was located in Kant's third Critique, the Critique of Judgement

Democracy · Epistemology · Judgement · Legitimacy · Mistake · Political philosophy · Political science · Politics · Hannah Arendt's Political Philosophy · Law · Philosophy

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae