Schmitt vs. Derrida
The Distinction between the Juridical and the Technical Rationality
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 11050178 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Hugo E Herrera (0000-0002-4868-4072, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2019 |
| Volume | 2019 |
| Issue | 187 |
| Pages | 8-30 |
| Publication date | 2019-01-01 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Telos (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0090-6514 • E-ISSN: 1940-459X |
| Publisher | Telos Press (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.3817/0619187008 |
| OpenAlex | W2953317678 |
| Language | EN |
1. Schmitt as a Jurist and the Technical Rationality Schmitt defines himself as a “jurist.” He says: “I have always spoken and written as a jurist, and hence also genuinely only for, and to, jurists.”1 This self-definition is corroborated in various passages.2 From the texts it may be gathered that Schmitt has an unusual conception of the law. The latter, as a way of understanding, is not restricted to the boundaries of a special discipline, understood according to the specialized manner in which subjects are commonly undertaken at universities.3 The law, that is, juridical rationality, instead appears as a fundamental
Epistemology · Political science · Rationality · Reflexive pronoun · Sociology · Law · Philosophy · Political Theology and Sovereignty · Violence, Religion, and Philosophy
| Highly cited | No |
|---|