Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Schmitt vs. Derrida

The Distinction between the Juridical and the Technical Rationality

Bibliographic Data

ID11050178
AuthorsHugo E Herrera (0000-0002-4868-4072, corresponding author)
Year2019
Volume2019
Issue187
Pages8-30
Publication date2019-01-01
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueTelos (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0090-6514 • E-ISSN: 1940-459X
PublisherTelos Press (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.3817/0619187008
OpenAlexW2953317678
LanguageEN

1. Schmitt as a Jurist and the Technical Rationality Schmitt defines himself as a “jurist.” He says: “I have always spoken and written as a jurist, and hence also genuinely only for, and to, jurists.”1 This self-definition is corroborated in various passages.2 From the texts it may be gathered that Schmitt has an unusual conception of the law. The latter, as a way of understanding, is not restricted to the boundaries of a special discipline, understood according to the specialized manner in which subjects are commonly undertaken at universities.3 The law, that is, juridical rationality, instead appears as a fundamental

Epistemology · Political science · Rationality · Reflexive pronoun · Sociology · Law · Philosophy · Political Theology and Sovereignty · Violence, Religion, and Philosophy

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae