Myth and Rationality in Politics
Carl Schmitt, Thomas Hobbes, and Liberalism's Materialist Quandary
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 11050408 |
|---|---|
| Authors | David Pan (0000-0003-3558-4125, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2018 |
| Volume | 2018 |
| Issue | 183 |
| Pages | 95-112 |
| Publication date | 2018-01-01 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Telos (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0090-6514 • E-ISSN: 1940-459X |
| Publisher | Telos Press (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.3817/0618183095 |
| OpenAlex | W2807760093 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
Discussions of Carl Schmitt's 1938 Leviathan in the State Theory of Thomas Hobbes have focused on the question of whether Schmitt defends a mythic conception of politics based on the idea of political theology or a rationalist approach that focuses on state power to the exclusion of theological justifications for power.1 The difficulty in assessing this text is that Schmitt provides in it both types of explanation for the stability of the state. On the one hand, Schmitt argues that the absolutist state originated out of fear. Once the religious civil wars began, the resulting destruction and chaos led to
Biopower · Epistemology · LEVIATHAN (cipher · Liberalism · Materialism · Mythology · Political philosophy · Political science · Political theology · Politics · Power (physics · Rationality · State (computer science · State of exception · Theology · Law · Marxism and Critical Theory · Philosophy · Political Theology and Sovereignty · Religious studies · Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought · Religious Studies
| Citations per year | 0.25 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2022 - 2022 (1) |
| Highly cited | No |