The Dialectic of Morality and the Morality of the Dialectic
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 11051291 |
|---|---|
| Authors | K Kosik (corresponding author) |
| Year | 1977 |
| Volume | 1977 |
| Issue | 33 |
| Pages | 85-92 |
| Publication date | 1977-10-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Telos (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0090-6514 • E-ISSN: 1940-459X |
| Publisher | Telos Press (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.3817/0977033085 |
| OpenAlex | W2331823842 |
| Language | EN |
It is important to differentiate between those theories on the one hand, that in principle are in a position to come to grips with major questions but, for whatever reasons, have remained incomplete, and those, on the other, which are incapable of ever doing that because they are simply unable to do so. For instance, Plekhanov's theory of art has never come close to a systematic analysis of art and, subsequently, was not capable of determining the artistic qualities of single works of art. It got stuck (bogged down) within the description of social conditions and the economic ‘equivalents.’ The gap is an expression of its theoretical inadequacy and not of the complexity of the object of its analysis
Aesthetics · Dialectic · Economics · Epistemology · Expression (computer science · Linguistics · Morality · Object (grammar · Position (finance · Sociology · Computer Science · Ethics, Aesthetics, and Art · Law in Society and Culture · Philosophy · Security, Politics, and Digital Transformation
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |