Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Quebec, Apartheid, Lithuania and Tibet

The Politics of Group Rights

Bibliographic Data

ID11051306
AuthorsFrederick Johnstone (corresponding author)
Year1990
Volume1990
Issue85
Pages56-62
Publication date1990-10-01
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueTelos (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0090-6514 • E-ISSN: 1940-459X
PublisherTelos Press (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.3817/0990085056
OpenAlexW2076533184
LanguageEN

There are millions of Quebeckers and millions of Zulus. But be careful when you talk about that. Do not use the “E word” in South Africa. But do not fail to use it in Canada. And do not talk about group rights in South Africa. But do not fail to talk about them in Quebec. Like alpinists who climb Mount Everest because “it is there,” the ANC routinely dismisses Inkatha (the Zulu movement) on the apparently self-evident grounds that “it is ethnic.” And democracy is simply equated with individual rights. ANC visitors to Canada then find mat political life in “progressive” Quebec is essentially structured along ethnic lines, and that Canada's constitutional crisis is all about group rights

Democracy · Development economics · Ethnic group · Ethnology · Mount · Political science · Politics · Sociology · Zulu · Canadian Identity and History · Gender Studies · Historical Geopolitical and Social Dynamics · Law · Political Systems and Governance

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae