Quebec, Apartheid, Lithuania and Tibet
The Politics of Group Rights
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 11051306 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Frederick Johnstone (corresponding author) |
| Year | 1990 |
| Volume | 1990 |
| Issue | 85 |
| Pages | 56-62 |
| Publication date | 1990-10-01 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Telos (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0090-6514 • E-ISSN: 1940-459X |
| Publisher | Telos Press (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.3817/0990085056 |
| OpenAlex | W2076533184 |
| Language | EN |
There are millions of Quebeckers and millions of Zulus. But be careful when you talk about that. Do not use the “E word” in South Africa. But do not fail to use it in Canada. And do not talk about group rights in South Africa. But do not fail to talk about them in Quebec. Like alpinists who climb Mount Everest because “it is there,” the ANC routinely dismisses Inkatha (the Zulu movement) on the apparently self-evident grounds that “it is ethnic.” And democracy is simply equated with individual rights. ANC visitors to Canada then find mat political life in “progressive” Quebec is essentially structured along ethnic lines, and that Canada's constitutional crisis is all about group rights
Democracy · Development economics · Ethnic group · Ethnology · Mount · Political science · Politics · Sociology · Zulu · Canadian Identity and History · Gender Studies · Historical Geopolitical and Social Dynamics · Law · Political Systems and Governance
| Highly cited | No |
|---|