Anaphoric Pronouns and the Computation of Prominence Profiles
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 11052018 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Barbara Tomaszewicz-Özakın (University of Cologne, corresponding author), Petra B Schumacher (0000-0003-0263-8502, University of Cologne) |
| Year | 2022 |
| Volume | 51 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 627-653 |
| Publication date | 2022-06-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Psycholinguistic Research (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0090-6905 • E-ISSN: 1573-6555 |
| Publisher | Springer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1007/s10936-022-09873-9 |
| PMID | 35430639 |
| OpenAlex | W4224214861 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 60 |
Previous research has investigated anaphoric resolution at the anaphor. Using a self-paced reading study we show that prominence profiles, i.e. the ranking of the referential candidates for anaphoric resolution, are dynamically established as discourse unfolds. We compared four types of context sentences introducing two referents and found that the cost of the computation of the prominence profile depends on the alignment of prominence-lending features, namely ‘left edge’, ‘agent’, ‘subject’. Cost occurs as referents become available. Further downstream, we contrasted two types of pronouns in German, personal pronoun vs. demonstrative pronoun. By the time the pronoun is encountered, profile computation is already complete, as indicated by the lack of interaction between context and pronoun type. An effect of pronoun reveals that resolution is driven by the form-dependent strength with which an interpretation is obtained (demonstrative pronouns being more stable than personal pronouns). The results also indicate that two prominence-lending features – subjecthood and agentivity – compete with each other
Algorithm · Anaphora (linguistics) · Computation · Context (archaeology) · Demonstrative · Linguistics · Natural language processing · Personal pronoun · Pronoun · Psycholinguistics · Reflexive pronoun · Resolution (logic) · Subject pronoun · Artificial Intelligence · Computer Science · History · Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies · Language, Metaphor, and Cognition · Philosophy · Psychology · Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
Givenness, Contrastiveness, Definiteness, Subjects, Topics, and Point of View
From Discourse to Logic
Interpreting pronouns and demonstratives in Finnish
Anaphoric biases of null and overt subjects in Italian and Spanish
The independence of syntactic processing
The extended argument dependency model
Thematic roles, focus and the representation of events
Pronouns, Names, and the Centering of Attention in Discourse
OpenSesame
The misinterpretation of noncanonical sentences
Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing
Logic and Conversation
Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4
LmerTest Package
Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items
Information Structure and Sentence Form
Accessing Noun-Phrase Antecedents (RLE Linguistics B
Topic Continuity in Discourse
The non-subject bias of German demonstrative pronouns
Thematic role as prominence cue during pronoun resolution in German
Empirical Perspectives on Anaphora Resolution
Cases and Thematic Roles
Reference determination for demonstrative pronouns
Coreference preferences for personal pronouns in German
The Effect of Thematic Roles on Pronoun Use and Frequency of Reference Continuation
Subject-Object Ambiguities in German Embedded Clauses
The use of heuristic strategies in the interpretation of pronouns
Coherence and Coreference Revisited
Agentivity drives real-time pronoun resolution
How Speakers Refer
A prominence-based account of temporal discourse structure
Prominence and coherence in a Bayesian theory of pronoun interpretation
Discourse prominence
Prominent protagonists
Revisiting Pronominal Typology
Cognitive Status and the Form of Referring Expressions in Discourse
Thematic Proto-Roles and Argument Selection
| Unique citing works | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 2 |
| Citation span | 2026 - 2026 (1) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 2 |