A Psycholinguistic Look at the Role of Field Dependence/Independence in Receptive/Productive Vocabulary Knowledge
Does it Draw a Line
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 11052099 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Kamal Heidari (0000-0002-5807-9941, Victoria University of Wellington, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2022 |
| Volume | 51 |
| Issue | 6 |
| Pages | 1393-1408 |
| Publication date | 2022-12-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Psycholinguistic Research (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0090-6905 • E-ISSN: 1573-6555 |
| Publisher | Springer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1007/s10936-022-09905-4 |
| PMID | 35916955 |
| OpenAlex | W4289524861 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 33 |
The thrust of this study was to investigate the impact of learning styles in general and Field dependence/Independence (FD/I) in particular on the receptive/productive lexical performance of language learners. It aimed to check whether FD/I learners perform differently on receptive and productive vocabulary tests. To achieve this, first, 94 Iranian language learners were given the Group Embedded Figure Test (GEFT) to determine their learning style; and second, they were put into two groups and were asked to take a receptive and a productive vocabulary test. Having collected and analyzed the data, the study revealed that first, with regard to the receptive test, although FI learners outperformed the FD ones, this outperformance was not significant statistically. Second, for the productive test, a significant difference was found between FIs and FDs with FI learners having a better performance. Third, FI learners acted significantly better in the productive test compared with receptive test. Finally, FD learners performed almost similarly in both receptive and productive tests. The pertinent implications are also discussed
Cognition · Cognitive psychology · Independence (probability theory) · Linguistics · Psycholinguistics · Receptive field · Statistics · Test (biology) · Vocabulary · Artificial Intelligence · Computer Science · Learning Styles and Cognitive Differences · Mathematics · Psychology · Second Language Acquisition and Learning · Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes
The Study of Second Language Acquisition
A Cognitive Approach to Language Learning (Oxford Applied Linguistics)
Element Interactivity and Intrinsic, Extraneous, and Germane Cognitive Load
Cognitive Load Measurement as a Means to Advance Cognitive Load Theory
Nine Ways to Reduce Cognitive Load in Multimedia Learning
Assessing Second Language Vocabulary Knowledge
Three Dimensions of Vocabulary Development
Receptive and Productive Vocabulary Sizes of L2 Learners
Conversational Interaction and Second Language Development
Cognitive Load During Problem Solving
Cognitive Style and EFL Learners’ Listening Comprehension Ability
Developing Second-Language Skills
A New Academic Word List
Effect of Field Independence-Dependence and Study Technique on Learning From a Lecture
Willingness to Communicate
Individual Differences
Field Dependence as a Factor in Second Language Communicative Production
Working Styles on Computers as Evidence of Second Language Learning Strategies
The Relationship of Field Dependent-independent Cognitive Styles to Foreign Language Achievement
Psychological Differentiation in Cross-Cultural Perspective
| Unique citing works | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,67 |
| Citation span | 2023 - 2025 (3) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 2 |