Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Is There an Orthographic Boost for Ambiguous Words During Their Processing

Bibliographic Data

ID11052166
AuthorsJuan Haro (0000-0002-3456-4731, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, corresponding author), Montserrat Comesaña (0000-0003-2547-7684, University of Minho), Pilar Ferré (0000-0002-3192-0040, Universitat Rovira i Virgili)
Year2019
Volume48
Issue2
Pages519-534
Publication date2019-04-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of Psycholinguistic Research (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0090-6905 • E-ISSN: 1573-6555
PublisherSpringer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1007/s10936-018-9616-1
PMID30478738
OpenAlexW2902478769
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited33

The present study explores the issue of why ambiguous words are recognized faster than unambiguous ones during word recognition. To this end we contrasted two different hypotheses: the semantic feedback hypothesis (Hino and Lupker in J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 22:1331-1356, 1996. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.22.6.1331 ), and the hypothesis proposed by Borowsky and Masson (J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cognit 22:63-85, 1996. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.22.1.63 ). Although both hypotheses agree that ambiguous words benefit during recognition in that they engage more semantic activation, they disagree as to whether or not this greater semantic activation feeds back to the orthographic level, hence speeding up the orthographic coding of ambiguous words. Participants were presented with ambiguous and unambiguous words in two tasks, a lexical decision task (LDT) and a two-alternative forced-choice task (2AFC). We found differences between ambiguous and unambiguous words in both the LDT and the 2AFC tasks. These results suggest that the orthographic coding of ambiguous words is boosted during word processing. This finding lends support to the semantic feedback hypothesis

Coding (social sciences) · Cognition · Cognitive psychology · Lexical decision task · Lexico · Lexicon · Linguistics · Natural language processing · Orthographic projection · Percept · Perception · Psycholinguistics · Speech recognition · Task (project management) · Word (group theory) · Word processing · Artificial Intelligence · Computer Science · Mathematics · Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies · Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism · Psychology · Reading and Literacy Development

  • Pupillometric and behavioural evidence shows no differences between polyseme and homonym processing

    Open Access•Juan Haro, Natalia López-Cortés et al.•Acta Psychologica•2023

  • Conscious and unconscious perception

    Open Access•Anthony J Marcel•Cognitive Psychology•1983

  • DMDX

    Open Access•Kenneth I Forster, Jonathan C Forster•Behavior Research Methods,…•2003

  • An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception

    James L Mcclelland, David E Rumelhart•Psychological Review•1981

  • EsPal

    Open Access•Andrew Duchon, Mauricio Perea et al.•Behavior Research Methods•2013

  • The Psychology of Word Meanings

    Open Access•Barbara Abbott•Language and Speech•1992

  • Ambiguity Advantage Revisited

    Open Access•Chien-Jer Charles Lin, Kami Ahrens et al.•Journal of Psycholinguistic…•2010

  • Semantic Ambiguity

    Open Access•Juan Haro, Pilar Ferré•Journal of Psycholinguistic…•2018

  • I saw this somewhere else

    Open Access•Isabel Fraga, Isabel Padrón et al.•Lingua•2017

Unique citing works1
Citations per year0,33
Citation span2023 - 2023 (1)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 1

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae