Psycholinguistic Investigation of the Immediate Interpretation of Plural Nouns in the Scope of Sentential Negation in Polish
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 11052331 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Piotr Gulgowski (0000-0002-0807-6697, University of Wrocław, corresponding author), Joanna Błaszczak (0000-0002-8332-2827, University of Wrocław) |
| Year | 2020 |
| Volume | 49 |
| Issue | 5 |
| Pages | 741-760 |
| Publication date | 2020-10-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Psycholinguistic Research (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0090-6905 • E-ISSN: 1573-6555 |
| Publisher | Springer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1007/s10936-020-09706-7 |
| PMID | 32495221 |
| OpenAlex | W3032787422 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 45 |
The number meaning of grammatically plural nouns is to some extent context sensitive. In negative sentences, plural nouns typically receive an inclusive reading referring to any number of individuals (one or many). This contrasts with their more frequent exclusive reading referring to a group of two or more individuals. The present study investigated whether a plural noun in a negative sentence is treated as inclusive immediately when it is encountered or whether this interpretation is delayed. In an experiment using a technique based on a numerical variant of the Stroop effect (Berent et al. in J Mem Lang 53:342–358, 2005. 10.1016/j.jml.2005.05.002 ; Patson and Warren in J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 36(3):782–789, 2010. 10.1037/a0018783 ), participants counted visually presented singular and plural Polish nouns embedded in either affirmative or negative sentences. The nouns were displayed once or as two copies. Plural nouns were easier to count when they were repeated twice on the screen than when only one copy was displayed. For singular nouns this pattern was reversed and the effect was weaker. Crucially, no difference was found for plural nouns appearing in affirmative and negative sentences. This indicated that an inclusive (“one or more”) reading of plural nouns in the scope of sentential negation was not immediate. The results are in line with past research suggesting that the semantic processing of a negative sentence may proceed in two phases (Fischler et al. in Psychophysiology 20(4):400–409, 1983. 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1983.tb00920.x ; Kaup et al. in J Pragmat 38:1033–1050, 2006. 10.1016/j.pragma.2005.09.012 ; Lüdtke et al. in J Cogn Neurosci 20(8):1355–1370, 2008. 10.1162/jocn.2008.20093 ; Spychalska in Proceedings of the 2011 ESSLLI student session, 2011)
Agreement · Cognition · Context (archaeology) · Linguistics · Negation · Noun · Plural · Proper noun · Psycholinguistics · Reading (process) · Sentence · Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills · History · Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism · Philosophy · Psychology · Reading and Literacy Development
Number
Polarity Sensitivity as (Non)Veridical Dependency
Integration of Visual and Linguistic Information in Spoken Language Comprehension
PsychoPy—Psychophysics software in Python
Thirty Years and Counting
The Plural is Semantically Unmarked
The time-course of prediction in incremental sentence processing
Broken agreement
Getting real about Semantic Illusions
Agreement Processes in Sentence Comprehension
Investigation into the Interaction between the Indefinites and Negation
NPI licensing, Strawson entailment, and context dependency
The semantics and pragmatics of plurals
The Grammaticization of Number as a Verbal Category
Half a century of research on the Stroop effect
Negation and polarity
Negative Contexts
Licensing strong NPIs
Negative contexts'. Collocation, polarity and multiple negation
Processing negated sentences with contradictory predicates
Polarity Sensitivity as (Non) Veridical Dependency
| Highly cited | No |
|---|