The Valence of Abstraction
A Paradox Revisited
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 11052411 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Rumen Iliev (0000-0003-1717-4309, Toyota Motor Corporation (Switzerland), autor correspondente), Anastasia Smirnova (0000-0001-5071-7569, San Francisco State University) |
| Ano | 2025 |
| Volume | 54 |
| Fascículo | 1 |
| Páginas | 4-4 |
| Data de publicação | 2025-02-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Sim |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | Journal of Psycholinguistic Research (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 0090-6905 • E-ISSN: 1573-6555 |
| Editora | Springer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1007/s10936-024-10122-4 |
| PMID | 39718646 |
| OpenAlex | W4405746084 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 1 |
| Referências citadas | 37 |
While abstraction is one of the best studied topics in psychology, there is little consensus on its relationship to valence and affect. Some studies have found that abstraction is associated with greater positivity, while other studies have led to the opposite conclusion. In this paper we suggest that a substantial part of this inconsistency can be attributed to the polysemy of the term abstraction. To address this problem, we use a framework developed by Iliev and Axelrod (Journal of psycholinguistic research, 46(3):715-729, 2017), who have proposed that abstraction should not be treated as a unitary construct, but should be split instead in at least two components. Concreteness is based on the proportion of sensory information in a concept, while precision is based on the aggregation of information corresponding to the concept's position in a semantic taxonomy. While both of these components have been used as operationalizations of abstraction, they can have opposite effects on cognitive performance. Using this framework, we hypothesize that when abstraction is defined as a reduction of precision, it will be associated with greater positivity, but when it is defined as lack of concreteness, it will be associated with less positivity. We test these predictions in a novel study and we find empirical support for both hypotheses. These findings advance our understanding of the link between abstraction and valence, and further demonstrate the multi-component structure of abstraction
Abstraction · Cognition · Epistemology · Natural language processing · Psycholinguistics · Valence (chemistry) · Behavioral Health and Interventions · Chemistry · Computer Science · Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics · Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior · Neuroscience · Philosophy · Psychology
Most People Are Happy
Moving beyond Kučera and Francis
It's the Mind-Set that Matters
Concreteness ratings for 40 thousand generally known English word lemmas
Norms of valence, arousal, and dominance for 13,915 English lemmas
WordNet
There Are Many Ways to See the Forest for the Trees
GLOMO sys
The pollyanna hypothesis
Promotion and Prevention
How Global Versus Local Perception Fits Regulatory Focus
Approach-Motivated Positive Affect Reduces Breadth of Attention
Construal-level theory of psychological distance.
Negativity Bias, Negativity Dominance, and Contagion
Approach/Avoidance Orientations Affect Self-construal and Identification with In-group
Construal‐level Mindsets Enhance Behavioral Persistence in Response to Incentive Valence
Toward a deeper understanding of the ecological origins of distance construal
Regulatory focus and temporal distance
Linguistic Signatures of Regulatory Focus
The effect of global versus local processing styles on assimilation versus contrast in social judgment
Why positive information is processed faster
Bad is Stronger than Good
The Paradox of Abstraction
Social Distance, Framing, and Judgment
The Distinct Affective Consequences of Psychological Distance and Construal Level
Regulatory Focus, Regulatory Fit, and the Search and Consideration of Choice Alternatives
Psychological Distancing
| Obras citantes distintas | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citações por ano | 1 |
| Intervalo de citações | 2025 - 2025 (1) |
| Velocidade de citação | recent |
| Altamente citado | Não |
| Tipos de citação | Neutras: 1 |