Pular para o conteúdo principal

ETHNOS_APP

Início • Busca • Periódicos • Lista 0

The Valence of Abstraction

A Paradox Revisited

Dados Bibliográficos

ID11052411
AutoresRumen Iliev (0000-0003-1717-4309, Toyota Motor Corporation (Switzerland), autor correspondente), Anastasia Smirnova (0000-0001-5071-7569, San Francisco State University)
Ano2025
Volume54
Fascículo1
Páginas4-4
Data de publicação2025-02-01
Peer ReviewedSim
Open AccessSim
TipoARTICLE
PeriódicoJournal of Psycholinguistic Research (JOURNAL)
Identificadores do periódicoISSN: 0090-6905 • E-ISSN: 1573-6555
EditoraSpringer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1007/s10936-024-10122-4
PMID39718646
OpenAlexW4405746084
IdiomaEN
Citações recebidas1
Referências citadas37

While abstraction is one of the best studied topics in psychology, there is little consensus on its relationship to valence and affect. Some studies have found that abstraction is associated with greater positivity, while other studies have led to the opposite conclusion. In this paper we suggest that a substantial part of this inconsistency can be attributed to the polysemy of the term abstraction. To address this problem, we use a framework developed by Iliev and Axelrod (Journal of psycholinguistic research, 46(3):715-729, 2017), who have proposed that abstraction should not be treated as a unitary construct, but should be split instead in at least two components. Concreteness is based on the proportion of sensory information in a concept, while precision is based on the aggregation of information corresponding to the concept's position in a semantic taxonomy. While both of these components have been used as operationalizations of abstraction, they can have opposite effects on cognitive performance. Using this framework, we hypothesize that when abstraction is defined as a reduction of precision, it will be associated with greater positivity, but when it is defined as lack of concreteness, it will be associated with less positivity. We test these predictions in a novel study and we find empirical support for both hypotheses. These findings advance our understanding of the link between abstraction and valence, and further demonstrate the multi-component structure of abstraction

Abstraction · Cognition · Epistemology · Natural language processing · Psycholinguistics · Valence (chemistry) · Behavioral Health and Interventions · Chemistry · Computer Science · Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics · Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior · Neuroscience · Philosophy · Psychology

  • The Psycholinguistics of Self-Talk in Logic-Based Therapy

    Open Access•Elliot D Cohen•Philosophies•2025

  • Most People Are Happy

    Open Access•Ed Diener, Carol Diener•Psychological Science•1996

  • Moving beyond Kučera and Francis

    Open Access•Marc Brysbaert, Boris New•Behavior Research Methods•2009

  • It's the Mind-Set that Matters

    Open Access•Katherine White, Rhiannon Macdonnell et al.•Journal of Marketing Research•2011

  • Concreteness ratings for 40 thousand generally known English word lemmas

    Open Access•Marc Brysbaert, Amy Beth Warriner et al.•Behavior Research Methods•2014

  • Norms of valence, arousal, and dominance for 13,915 English lemmas

    Open Access•Amy Beth Warriner, Victor Kuperman et al.•Behavior Research Methods•2013

  • WordNet

    Open Access•George A Miller•Communications of the ACM•1995

  • There Are Many Ways to See the Forest for the Trees

    Open Access•Erin M Burgoon, Marlone D Henderson et al.•Perspectives on Psychological…•2013

  • GLOMO sys

    Jens Förster, Laura Dannenberg•Psychological Inquiry•2010

  • The pollyanna hypothesis

    Open Access•Jerry D Boucher, Jerry Boucher et al.•Journal of Verbal Learning and…•1969

  • Promotion and Prevention

    E Tory Higgins•Advances in Experimental Social…•1998

  • How Global Versus Local Perception Fits Regulatory Focus

    Open Access•Jens Förster, E Tory Higgins•Psychological Science•2005

  • Approach-Motivated Positive Affect Reduces Breadth of Attention

    Open Access•Philip A Gable, Eddie Harmon-Jones•Psychological Science•2008

  • Construal-level theory of psychological distance.

    Yaacov Trope, Nira Liberman•Psychological Review•2010

  • Negativity Bias, Negativity Dominance, and Contagion

    Open Access•Paul Rozin, Edward B Royzman•Personality and Social Psychology…•2001

  • Approach/Avoidance Orientations Affect Self-construal and Identification with In-group

    Ravit Nussinson, Michael Häfner et al.•Self and Identity•2011

  • Construal‐level Mindsets Enhance Behavioral Persistence in Response to Incentive Valence

    Open Access•Atul Kulkarni, Hong Yuan•Journal of Behavioral Decision…•2017

  • Toward a deeper understanding of the ecological origins of distance construal

    Open Access•Klaus Fiedler, Janis Jung et al.•Journal of Experimental Social…•2014

  • Regulatory focus and temporal distance

    Open Access•Ginger L Pennington, Neal J Roese•Journal of Experimental Social…•2003

  • Linguistic Signatures of Regulatory Focus

    Gün R Semin, Tory Higgins et al.•Journal of Personality and Social…•2005

  • The effect of global versus local processing styles on assimilation versus contrast in social judgment

    Jens Förster, Nira Liberman et al.•Journal of Personality and Social…•2008

  • Why positive information is processed faster

    Christian Unkelbach, Klaus Fiedler et al.•Journal of Personality and Social…•2008

  • Bad is Stronger than Good

    Open Access•Roy F Baumeister, Ellen Bratslavsky et al.•Review of General Psychology•2001

  • The Paradox of Abstraction

    Open Access•Rumen Iliev, Robert Axelrod•Journal of Psycholinguistic…•2017

  • Social Distance, Framing, and Judgment

    Open Access•Xiaoli Nan•Human Communication Research•2007

  • The Distinct Affective Consequences of Psychological Distance and Construal Level

    Lawrence E Williams, Randy Stein et al.•Journal of Consumer Research•2014

  • Regulatory Focus, Regulatory Fit, and the Search and Consideration of Choice Alternatives

    Michel Tuan Pham, Hannah H Chang•Journal of Consumer Research•2010

  • Psychological Distancing

    Aparna A Labroo, Vanessa M Patrick•Journal of Consumer Research•2009

Obras citantes distintas1
Citações por ano1
Intervalo de citações2025 - 2025 (1)
Velocidade de citaçãorecent
Altamente citadoNão
Tipos de citaçãoNeutras: 1
Ethnos_APP • Projeto Open Source • Licença MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidade e Cookies • Documentação da API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código da API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código do Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae