Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Metamorphoses of the Signifier in “Unnatural” Languages

Bibliographic Data

ID11059139
AuthorsMarie Maclean (corresponding author)
Year1984
Volume11
IssuePart 2
Pages166-173
Publication date1984-07-01
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueScience Fiction Studies (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0091-7729 • E-ISSN: 2327-6207
PublisherUniversity of California Press (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1525/sfs.11.2.0166
OpenAlexW4410329050
LanguageEN

The extent and force of metafiction, and especially of modern SF—of that intellectual adventure which could be called “cognitive subversion”—owes much to an increasing understanding of language. The construction of artificial languages, the exploration of knowledge systems and of cybernetics, and information theory generally all lead to a literature which exploits the connections between human, or “natural, ” semiotic systems and others which are artificial, or “unnatural.” To facilitate our comprehension of the latter, I would propose a preliminary scheme of classification based in two large groupings: leximatic and non-leximatic. The leximatic group comprises the following categories: (1) the signifier whose signified is absent (mis-sing, empty); (2) the signifier having a single signified (as in computer language, at least ideally); (3) the signifier whose signified obeys logical rules (as in cybernetics); and (4) the signifier whose signified is re-evaluated by its context (future, parallel, or whatnot). The non-leximatic group includes these categories: (5) the compact signifier (as in portmanteau words, techno-neologisms, etc.); (6) the modified signifier (derived through extrapolation from future languages); and (7) the “arbitrary,” or exolinguistic, signifier, for the most part a sign or icon whose motivation is, say, phonetic, visual, or anagrammatic. (The use of the arbitrary signifier usually depends on the insertion of a “motivated” sign into a semiotic system peculiar to the world of the text—depends, that is, on what Marc Angenot calls the “absent paradigm.”) How these diverse signifiers function and what they can tell us about the relationships between “natural” and “unnatural” languages as they figure in SF texts are questions best approached through Roland Barthes’ concepts of connotation and metalanguage, from the standpoint of which the capacity of fiction to transform and reinterpret chains of signification is most apparent. (MM)

Art · Linguistics · Lexicography and Language Studies · Linguistics and language evolution · Philosophy · Swearing, Euphemism, Multilingualism

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae