Determinacy, Indeterminacy, and the Romantic in William Gibson
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 11060196 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Randy Schroeder (corresponding author) |
| Year | 1994 |
| Volume | 21 |
| Issue | Part 3 |
| Pages | 155-163 |
| Publication date | 1994-07-01 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Science Fiction Studies (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0091-7729 • E-ISSN: 2327-6207 |
| Publisher | University of California Press (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1525/sfs.21.2.0155 |
| OpenAlex | W4408954361 |
| Language | EN |
Postmodernisms reject both realism/antirealism and determinism/indeterminism as western ontological binaries. In this context, William Gibson can be read for residual modes of thinking: his fiction invokes western ontological terms, in conjunction with “romantic” patterns of depth and surface. Determinism and indeterminism form a simple narrative binary. Romantic strains oppose both determinism and indeterminism by affirming meanings outside the realm of signs, giving rise to a triadic narrative pattern of opposition and overlap. At the same time, this narrative pattern reintroduces traditional modes of representation, where ‘%neaning” is finally located within depth, ambiguity, and metaphor. (RS)
Determinacy · Epistemology · Fascicle · Indeterminacy (philosophy) · Mathematical analysis · Psychoanalysis · Romance · Art, Technology, and Culture · Digital Games and Media · Geology · Mathematics · Paleontology · Philosophy · Psychology · Utopian, Dystopian, and Speculative Fiction
| Highly cited | No |
|---|