Students' Evaluation of Teaching and Accountability
Implications from the Boyer and the ASA Reports
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 11062007 |
|---|---|
| Authors | D E Benson (0000-0001-9817-1323, corresponding author), Jerry M Lewis (0000-0001-5858-8634) |
| Year | 1994 |
| Volume | 22 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 195 |
| Publication date | 1994-04-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Teaching Sociology (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0092-055X • E-ISSN: 1939-862X |
| Publisher | SAGE Publications (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.2307/1318566 |
| OpenAlex | W2057500756 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 4 |
| References cited | 1 |
teaching has been a reality in academe since the turbulent 1960s (Abrami 1989). Linked by university administrations to the career rewards of tenure, promotion, and merit pay, such evaluations have been defined by many academics as a necessary evil. A few professors with strong teaching records applauded these evaluations as useful diagnostic tools for improving their teaching. Anecdotal evidence, however, suggests that most faculty members viewed them as primafacie evidence of administrators' intrusion into
Accountability · Higher education · Mathematics education · Medical education · Pedagogy · Political science · Sociology · Accounting Education and Careers · Evaluation of Teaching Practices · Higher Education Governance and Development · Law · Medicine · Psychology
| Unique citing works | 4 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,17 |
| Citation span | 2002 - 2015 (14) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 4 |