Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Policymaking by Referendum in Palau

Grassroots Democracy or Political Paralysis

Bibliographic Data

ID11068440
AuthorsLarry N Gerston (San Jose State University, corresponding author)
Year1989
Volume16
Issue4
Pages175-185
Publication date1989-12-01
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueAsian Affairs An American Review (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0092-7678 • E-ISSN: 1940-1590
PublisherInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/00927678.1989.10553608
OpenAlexW2322456847
LanguageEN
Citations received2
References cited3

Among the many mechanisms connecting citizens and leaders, it is the referendum that has emerged as a valuable political tool. Formal solicitation of voter sentiment at the ballot booth gives elected officials crucial information about public values.' At the same time, citizens participate in political decisions that may have a profound effect on the future of their society. Historically, the referendum, or plebiscite, was employed by dictators as an emotional device to shore up support for controversial decisions. Thus, when Napoleon felt threatened from within, he conducted (somewhat transparent) votes of confidence via the referendum.2 During the fascist regimes in Germany and Italy, Hitler and Mussolini employed the referendum to demonstrate widespread domestic support of their policies.3 In modern times, the referendum has often served as a policymaking instrument for significant public issues, going far beyond the artificial support of a particular regime. One study points to the utilization of the referendum in at least seventeen countries since 1945. In some places-such as Belgium, Colombia, Norway, and Turkey-it has been used only once; alternatively, Switzerland has employed the referendum as a policymaking conduit on more than 160 occasions.4 Perhaps the most recent example of a truly influential referendum was the Chilean decision in 1988 on whether to continue under the authoritarian regime of President Augusto Pinochet or to choose a new president through the competitive electoral process. On this occasion (although it has not yet been implemented), the plebiscite became a vehicle to replace one form of government with another

Authoritarianism · Ballot · Democracy · Government (linguistics · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Public opinion · Public support · Referendum · Sociology · Voting · Law · Political Systems and Governance · Public Administration

  • Size and Personalistic Politics

    Wouter Veenendaal•The Round Table•2013

  • How democracy functions without parties

    Open Access•Wouter Veenendaal, Wouter P Veenendaal•Party Politics•2016

  • Political Order in Changing Societies

    Samuel P Huntington•Political Order in Changing…•1969

  • Nationalism and national development.

    Karl W Deutsch•Nationalism and national…•1970

  • Termination of the U.S. trusteeship in Micronesia∗

    Robert C Kiste•Journal of Pacific History•1986

Citations per year0.15
Citation span2013 - 2016 (4)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae