Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Wellsprings of Intervention

The United States and Korea

Bibliographic Data

ID11069284
AuthorsDonald S Macdonald (corresponding author)
Year1981
Volume9
Issue2
Pages104-128
Publication date1981-11-01
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueAsian Affairs An American Review (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0092-7678 • E-ISSN: 1940-1590
PublisherInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/00927678.1981.10553736
OpenAlexW2279129017
LanguageEN
References cited2

oninterference in the affairs of sovereign states has become a rallying-cry in the councils of developing nations, along with anticolonialism and anti-imperialism. It is prominent in the Five Principles adopted at Bandung in 1955, and in the United Nations code of national conduct. It follows logically from the 17th-century concept of national sovereignty in Western international law, and from the 19th-century European idea of nationalism. Expressed as the right of self-determination, this idea was both reflected and promoted by Woodrow Wilson's Fourteen Points of 1918, and was espoused by colonial peoples in the struggle to throw off European rule.1 record shows, however, that interference, rather than noninterference, has been the rule in the real relations of states since the beginning of recorded history. The strong do what they can;the weak do what they must. More recent events suggest, at best, a very modest trend away from this rule. Intervention by one state in another is recognized and, in some circumstances, sanctioned in international law. Moreover, interference is by no means limited to the superpowers; developing nations are interfering with one another in every region of the globe.2 A better understanding of the nature and causes of interference may help in narrowing the gap between principle and practice. Korea, with its long and painful history of involvement with other nations, is a useful example for the study of such interference.3 purpose of this essay is to contribute a preliminary survey of relationships between Korea and the United States during the past century and more-not in the traditional pattern of studies in inter

Colonialism · Globe · International law · International relations · Intervention (counseling · Nationalism · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Sociology · Sovereignty · State (computer science · Global Peace and Security Dynamics · International Law and Human Rights · Korean Peninsula Historical and Political Studies · Law · Psychology

  • The Oxford History of the American People

    Richard H Dillon, Samuel Eliot Morison•Western Folklore•1966

  • Sentimental Imperialists. The American Experience in East Asia

    Warren I Cohen, James C Thomson et al.•Pacific Affairs•1983

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae