Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Fisher v. University of Texas

A Call for Democratic Constitutionalism in Promoting Diversity

Bibliographic Data

ID11103605
AuthorsNorma M Riccucci (0000-0002-9229-7408, Rutgers University, Newark, NJ, USA, corresponding author)
Year2014
Volume46
Issue2
Pages169-180
Publication date2014-03-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueAdministration & Society (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0095-3997 • E-ISSN: 1552-3039
PublisherSAGE Publications (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1177/0095399713515877
OpenAlexW2148481291
LanguageEN
Citations received3
References cited3

The eminent scholar John Rohr in one of his many treatises argued that as we progress through time, the U.S. Supreme Court becomes more socially adaptable in terms of its interpretation of race issues under the U.S. Constitution. He also pointed out that the courts should be working with policy makers responding to the demands of the day, to promote vital goals such as diversity in higher education. This article illustrates the evolution of affirmative action qua diversity over time, and shows that through the progression of time, the High Court’s decisions on diversity or affirmative action programs have become more enlightened, certainly reflecting the values of policy makers as well as societal norms. In 2013, the Court agreed to hear an appeal to Fifth Circuit’s ruling in Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin, which upheld the use of affirmative action in accordance with Grutter as well as Bakke. If the Court had overturned these decisions, it would have single-handedly destroyed decades of progress made around diversity in university settings, and concomitantly disdainfully rejected the values of the American people. Instead, the Court sent Fisher back to the lower court, instructing it to apply strict scrutiny to the University of Texas’ claim that its program was narrowly tailored, thereby leaving open the possibility that affirmative action, as framed by Grutter and Bakke, will not survive

Affirmative action · Appeal · Constitution · Diversity (politics · Political science · Scrutiny · Sociology · Supreme court · Judicial and Constitutional Studies · Law · Legal Education and Practice Innovations · Legal Systems and Judicial Processes

  • Systematically Reviewing American Law and Public Administration

    Open Access•Andrew Osorio, Sarah M Nielsen et al.•Perspectives on Public Management…•2020

  • Beyond Students for Fair Admissions and Trump 2.0

    H Yu, Helen H Yu•Administrative Theory & Praxis•2026

  • Preparing Blacks and Latinx for Workforce 2000

    Open Access•Norma M Riccucci•Administration & Society•2021

  • The Core of the Case against Judicial Review

    Jeremy Waldron•The Yale Law Journal•2006

  • The people themselves

    Larry Kramer, Larry D Kramer•The people themselves•2004

Citations per year0.5
Citation span2020 - 2026 (7)
Highly citedNo
Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae