Facet‐level analysis of the relations between personality and laboratory aggression
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 11105261 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Courtland S Hyatt (0000-0002-8245-959X, Department of Psychology University of Georgia Athens Georgia, corresponding author), David S Chester (0000-0002-9383-7138, Department of Psychology Virginia Commonwealth University Richmond Virginia), Amos Zeichner (Department of Psychology University of Georgia Athens Georgia), Joshua D Miller (0000-0002-2171-856X, Department of Psychology University of Georgia Athens Georgia) |
| Year | 2020 |
| Volume | 46 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 266-277 |
| Publication date | 2020-05-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Aggressive Behavior (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0096-140X • E-ISSN: 1098-2337 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1002/ab.21887 |
| PMID | 32149387 |
| OpenAlex | W3010754693 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 5 |
| References cited | 60 |
Multiple reviews and meta‐analyses have identified the low pole of the Five‐Factor Model (FFM) Agreeableness (also called Antagonism) as the primary domain‐level personality correlates of aggression across self‐report and behavioral methodologies. In the current study, we expand on this literature by investigating the relations between FFM facets and aggressive behavior as measured by laboratory competitive reaction time tasks (CRTTs). Across three samples (total N = 639), we conducted weighted mean analyses, multiple regression analyses, and dominance analyses to determine which FFM facets were the strongest predictors of aggression within and across domains. These analyses suggested that facets of Agreeableness were among the strongest consistent predictors of CRTT aggression, including Sympathy ( r = −.21) and Cooperation ( r = −.14), but facets from other FFM domains also yielded meaningful relations (e.g., Anger from Neuroticism; r = .17). We conclude by discussing these results in the context of controversies surrounding laboratory aggression paradigms and emphasizing the importance of considering small effect sizes in the prediction of societally harmful behavior like aggression
Aggression · Agreeableness · Anger · Big Five personality traits · Conscientiousness · Context (archaeology · Developmental psychology · Dominance (genetics · Extraversion and introversion · Facet (psychology · Medical emergency · Neuroticism · Personality · Poison control · Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression · Clinical Psychology · Crime Patterns and Interventions · Personality Traits and Psychology · Psychology · Social Psychology
Validation d’une procédure de dépistage du trouble de personnalité limite selon le Modèle alternatif pour les troubles de la personnalité du DSM-5
The structure of aggressive personality
Social mobility beliefs moderate links between SSS, attributions for wealth and poverty, and aggression
Development of a measure of aggressive behavior expectancies in adults
Aggression by omission
Frustration and aggression.
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
Using the five-factor model to represent the DSM-IV personality disorders
Measurement of constructs using self-report and behavioral lab tasks
The high societal costs of childhood conduct problems
Anger and the behavioral approach system
Large-scale analysis of test–retest reliabilities of self-regulation measures
Differences among dark triad components
Research Review
A meta-analytic review of the relationships between the five-factor model and DSM-IV-TR personality disorders
Four ways five factors are basic
A Note on Some Measures of Profile Agreement
On the sins of short-form development.
Mini Meta‐Analysis of Your Own Studies
Evaluating Effect Size in Psychological Research
Personality Structure
Validating a Standardized Approach to the Taylor Aggression Paradigm
Antisociality and the Construct of Psychopathy
Triarchic Model of Psychopathy
Uncovering the structure of agreeableness from self‐report measures
Aggressive behavior and physiological arousal as a function of provocation and the tendency to inhibit aggression1
Personality, antisocial behavior, and aggression
Personality and aggressive behavior under provoking and neutral conditions
Measurement of Laboratory Aggression
Structural Models of Personality and Their Relation to Antisocial Behavior
Analytic flexibility in laboratory aggression paradigms
Hot Sauce, toy guns, and graffiti
The competitive reaction time task
Breaking the link
Further evidence for the validity of the Taylor Aggression Paradigm
Personality correlates of revenge‐seeking
The international personality item pool and the future of public-domain personality measures
Personality and laboratory-based aggression
Big Five factors and facets and the prediction of behavior
How large are gender differences in aggression? A developmental meta-analysis
The basic trait of Antagonism
In defense of external invalidity
Anger is an approach-related affect
Dominance analysis
Gender differences in aggression as a function of provocation
| Citations per year | 1.67 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2023 - 2025 (3) |
| Highly cited | No |