The Politics of Commemorating the Woman Suffrage Movement in New York City

This article traces the commission, design, and public reception for New York City’s Women’s Rights Pioneers Monument as a case study for the contentious politics of monument-building. The Central Park statue—as of this writing, not yet realized—has followed a protracted, frequently contested path since its conception in 2015. It was originally designed to depict women’s rights activists Susan B. Anthony and Elizabeth Cady Stanton for the centennial anniversary of the Nineteenth Amendment. What began as an initially well-received initiative to correct the gender imbalance in the city’s public art became mired in controversy amid the politically charged atmosphere of the election of Donald Trump to the U.S. presidency. I argue that, while the polarity of contemporary politics amplified the statue’s controversy, the tensions at play are the product of more than 170 years of conflicts inherent in the progressive activism of the American woman suffrage movement and commemorations of it

Archaeology · Art history · Centennial · Dissenting opinion · Political science · Politics · Presidency · Sociology · Statue · Suffrage · Gender Studies · Historical Gender and Feminism Studies · History · Law · Memory, Trauma, and Commemoration · Visual Culture and Art Theory