A polissemia do liberalismo
As diferentes abordagens de Wallerstein, Sen e Fukuyama
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 11137975 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Leonardo Luiz Silveira Da Silva (0000-0002-7082-529X, Nesta, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2014 |
| Volume | 23 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 119-134 |
| Publication date | 2014-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Teoria e Pesquisa (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0104-0103 • E-ISSN: 2236-0107 |
| Publisher | Editora Cubo (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.4322/tp.2014.007 |
| OpenAlex | W4248596075 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 1 |
Some recurring concepts from the field of political theory haven't been used in the right context, giving rise to ambiguities that compromise the correct interpretation of several arguments. At this juncture fits the concept of liberalism, which is polysemic and used in various textual contexts. Understanding the diversity of the use of the concept of liberalism is an essential task for students and professionals dealing with political theory. For experienced researchers to be aware of this diversity enhances their pedagogical instruments, because the concept of liberalism is applied to textual contexts as varied that could lead them to erroneous analyzes. This article aims to highlight the importance of understanding of the multiple meanings of liberalism, using three approaches of recognized scholars belonging humanities: Immanuel Wallerstein's After Liberalism; Amartya Sen's Development as Freedom and the Francis Fukuyama's End of History. The distinctive approach of these three authors show some possibilities of ambiguous reading that can lead readers to more careless hasty evaluations of the use of the concept in question
Brazilian cultural history and politics · Brazilian History and Foreign Policy · Philosophy · Social and Political Issues
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |