Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Democracia e liberdade em disputa nas redes

Uma análise da tentativa de golpe de Estado no Brasil em 2023

Bibliographic Data

ID11155152
AuthorsClaudio Luis Penteado (0000-0002-8279-3643, Universidade Federal do ABC), Paulo Roberto Elias De Souza (0000-0002-5847-241X, Universidade Federal do ABC), Patrícia Dias Dos Santos (0000-0002-4109-8097), Patrícia dos Santos Dias (0000-0001-5181-1637, Universidade Federal do ABC), Luana Hanaê Gabriel Homma (0000-0003-1533-2406)
Year2025
Issue94
Pages23-43
Publication date2025-10-15
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueRevista de Estudios Sociales (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0123-885X • E-ISSN: 1900-5180
PublisherUniversidad de los Andes (PUBLISHER • VE)
DOI10.7440/res94.2025.02
OpenAlexW4415225471
LanguagePT

This article examines the discursive formations mobilized in the online public debate on X (formerly Twitter) by users who supported or opposed the attempted coup in Brazil, known as the “anti-democratic acts of January 8, 2023.” On that day, supporters of former president Jair Bolsonaro invaded and vandalized the headquarters of the Legislative, Executive, and Judicial branches in an effort to overturn the results of the 2022 elections. In a digitalized and platform-driven society, online debate mirrors political struggles between opposing groups, who use the circulation of content to influence public opinion and legitimize their actions. To investigate this dispute, the study adopted a three-stage methodological strategy: computational techniques to collect digital platform data, natural language processing to identify users’ political positions, and topic modeling to group terms and reveal the main discursive formations shaping the online debate. The analysis draws on Ernesto Laclau and Chantal Mouffe’s discourse theory to interpret the conflict between antagonistic political groups. The research focused on the contested meanings of democracy and freedom, understood as nodal points around which discursive practices are articulated. The findings indicate that groups supportive of the events framed popular revolt and military intervention as patriotic duties in defense of democracy and freedom, while opposing groups appealed to democracy to classify demonstrators as “coup plotters” and “terrorists,” demanding accountability and conceiving of freedom within constitutional boundaries

Brazilian Legal Issues · Social and Political Issues · Youth, Politics, and Society

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae