Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Coercion, consensus, and capability

The Warsaw Pact and the institutional limits of Nato and EU defence coordination

Bibliographic Data

ID11157609
AuthorsBence Nemeth (0000-0001-9452-1197, King's College London, corresponding author)
Year2026
Pages1-32
Publication date2026-03-17
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of Strategic Studies (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0140-2390 • E-ISSN: 1743-937X
PublisherInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/01402390.2026.2639391
OpenAlexW7137992115
LanguageEN
References cited33

This article assesses the institutional limits of multilateral defence coordination by comparing the Warsaw Pact with NATO and the EU across capability planning, industrial policy and regional investment. Treating the Warsaw Pact as an upper-bound case of enforced integration, it contrasts its coercive, hierarchical mechanisms with the consensus-based frameworks used in NATO and the EU. The analysis shows that although coercion can raise baseline cooperation, it cannot overcome enduring asymmetries of political economy, national preferences and geography that also constrain NATO and the EU. The article concludes that institutional design cannot offset divergent interests, economies and strategic geographies

European union · Foreign policy · International relations · Strategic studies · European and Russian Geopolitical Military Strategies · European Politics and Security · European Union Policy and Governance

  • Allies That Count

    Olivier Schmitt•Allies That Count•2018

  • Rediscovering geography in Nato defence planning

    Alexander Mattelaer•Defence Studies•2018

  • Cooperation and conflict in the European defence-industrial field

    Antonio Calcara•Defence Studies•2018

  • Transatlantic cooperation in flux

    Gorm Rye Olsen•Defence Studies•2022

  • The Nato-Warsaw Pact competition in the 1970s and 1980s

    Diego A Ruiz Palmer•Cold War History•2014

  • Face to face

    Open Access•Antonio Calcara, Luis Simón•Journal of European Public Policy•2024

  • Neorealism, Security Cooperation, and Europe's Relative Gains Dilemma

    Luis Simón•Security Studies•2017

  • Cooperation and non cooperation in European defence procurement

    Antonio Calcara•Journal of European Integration•2019

  • Illusions of Autonomy

    Hugo Meijer, Stephen G Brooks•International Security•2021

  • Making sense of European armaments policies

    Antonio Calcara•Comparative Strategy•2019

  • Offensive defence in the Warsaw pact

    Christoph Bluth•Journal of Strategic Studies•1995

  • Romania and the Warsaw pact

    Alex Alexiev•Journal of Strategic Studies•1981

  • The failure of defense planning in European Post-Communist Defense Institutions

    Thomas-Durell Young, Thomas‐Durell Young•Journal of Strategic Studies•2018

  • The State of Nato

    R D Hooker•Survival•2022

  • The Warsaw Pact today

    Malcolm Mackintosh•Survival•1974

  • Nato at 75

    Sara Bjerg Moller•Survival•2023

  • Budget Crunch

    Bastian Giegerich•Survival•2010

  • Military Spending in the USSR

    Open Access•Ksenia Gonchar•Journal of Peace Research•1994

  • The return to collective defence

    Open Access•Elie Perot•International Affairs•2025

  • From Liberalisation to Industrial Policy

    Open Access•Daniel Fiott•JCMS Journal of Common Market…•2024

  • The Security Dilemma in Alliance Politics

    Open Access•Glenn H Snyder•World Politics•1984

  • Why Alliances Entangle But Seldom Entrap States

    Tongfi Kim•Security Studies•2011

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae