Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Theorizing cyber coercion

The 2014 North Korean operation against Sony

Bibliographic Data

ID11159012
AuthorsTRAVIS SHARP (0000-0003-3554-0018, Princeton University, corresponding author)
Year2017
Volume40
Issue7
Pages898-926
Publication date2017-11-10
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of Strategic Studies (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0140-2390 • E-ISSN: 1743-937X
PublisherInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/01402390.2017.1307741
OpenAlexW2606459892
LanguageEN
Citations received23
References cited32

This article challenges the conventional wisdom that cyber operations have limited coercive value. It theorizes that cyber operations contribute to coercion by imposing costs and destabilizing an opponent’s leadership. As costs mount and destabilization spreads, the expected utility of capitulation surpasses that of continued defiance, leading the opponent’s leaders to comply with the coercer’s demands. The article applies this ‘cost-destabilization’ model to the 2014 North Korean cyber operation against Sony. Through cost imposition and leadership destabilization, the North Korean operation, despite its lack of physical destructiveness, caused Sony to make a series of costly decisions to avoid future harm

Adversary · Business · Coercion (linguistics · Computer security · Economics · Harm · Law and economics · Mount · Political economy · Political science · Value (mathematics · Computer Science · Cybercrime and Law Enforcement Studies · Cybersecurity and Cyber Warfare Studies · Engineering · Information and Cyber Security · Law

  • Politik in der digitalen Gesellschaft

    Jeanette Hofmann, Norbert Kersting et al.•Politik in der digitalen…

  • Copenhagen school and securitization of cyberspace in Turkey

    Open Access•Didem Aydindag, Didem Aydındağ•Propósitos y Representaciones•2021

  • Cyber Security Politics

    Andreas Wenger, Myriam Dunn Cavelty et al.•Cyber Security Politics•2022

  • The Microfoundations of State Cybersecurity

    Open Access•Nadiya Kostyuk, Carly N Wayne•Journal of Global Security Studies•2019

  • A Lot of Cyber Fizzle But Not A Lot of Bang

    Open Access•Jacquelyn G Schneider, Benjamin Schechter et al.•Journal of Global Security Studies•2022

  • The Bureaucratic Politics of Cyber Strategy

    Open Access•Nadiya Kostyuk, Evan Perkoski et al.•Journal of Global Security Studies•2025

  • Digital Retaliation? Denial-of-Service Attacks after Sanction Events

    Open Access•Philipp M Lutscher•Journal of Global Security Studies•2021

  • Cartographier un angle mort

    Camille François, Herbert Lin•Hérodote•2020

  • Cyber uncertainties

    Miguel Alberto Gomez, Christopher Whyte•Cyber Security Politics•2022

  • On the Brink

    Open Access•Van Jackson•On the Brink•2018

  • The People’s Republic of China’s Cyber Coercion

    Mark Bryan Manantan•Issues & Studies•2020

  • Fancy bears and digital trolls

    Benjamin Jensen, Brandon Valeriano et al.•Journal of Strategic Studies•2019

  • Disrupt and restraint

    Stéphane Taillat•Arms Control•2019

  • Saving face in the cyberspace

    Open Access•Yehonatan Abramson, Gil Baram•Arms Control•2023

  • Does plausible deniability work? Assessing the effectiveness of unclaimed coercive acts in the Ukraine war

    Costantino Pischedda, Andrew Cheon•Arms Control•2023

  • On the asymmetric advantages of cyberwarfare. Western literature and the Chinese journal Guofang Keji

    Simone Dossi•Journal of Strategic Studies•2020

  • Military strategy in the 21st century

    Kersti Larsdotter•Journal of Strategic Studies•2019

  • New technology, old strategy

    Nathaniel Allen, Matthew La Lime•Journal of Strategic Studies•2024

  • Unpacking state-sponsored cyber conflict

    William Akoto•Journal of Strategic Studies•2026

  • US cyber deterrence

    Alex S Wilner•Journal of Strategic Studies•2020

  • Minding the gap? The strategic logic of cyber coercion in theory and practice

    Erica D Lonergan•Journal of Strategic Studies•2026

  • Stuxnet revisited

    Jon R Lindsay•Journal of Strategic Studies•2025

  • Doxing democracy

    Isabella Hansen, Darren J Lim•Contemporary Politics•2019

  • Bombing to win

    Robert Anthony Pape•Bombing to win•1996

  • Regarding Politics

    Harry Eckstein•Regarding Politics•1992

  • Prospect Theory

    Daniel Kahneman, Amos Tversky•Econometrica•1979

  • Conventional Deterrence

    John J Mearsheimer•Conventional Deterrence (Cornell…•1985

  • Deterrence and Defense

    Glenn Herald Snyder•Deterrence and Defense•1961

  • Strategic Choice and International Relations

    Open Access•David A Lake, Robert Powell•Strategic Choice and International…•1999

  • Analogical reasoning and cyber security

    Open Access•David Betz, David J Betz et al.•Security Dialogue•2013

  • Blowback

    Peter Feaver•Security Studies•1998

  • The political effects of information warfare

    Bradley A Thayer•Security Studies•2000

  • Militarized Compellent Threats, 1918–2001

    Open Access•Todd S Sechser•Conflict Management and Peace…•2011

  • The Myth of Cyberwar

    Erik Gartzke•International Security•2013

  • The Meaning of the Cyber Revolution

    Lucas Kello•International Security•2013

  • The Impact of China on Cybersecurity

    Jon R Lindsay•International Security•2015

  • What Is the Cyber Offense-Defense Balance? Conceptions, Causes, and Assessment

    Rebecca Slayton•International Security•2017

  • Attributing Cyber Attacks

    Thomas Rid, Ben Buchanan•Journal of Strategic Studies•2015

  • Cyber War Will Not Take Place

    Thomas Rid•Journal of Strategic Studies•2012

  • Cyberwar

    Adam P Liff•Journal of Strategic Studies•2012

  • The Life Cycles of Cyber Threats

    Ben Buchanan•Survival•2016

  • Cyber Attacks in La-La Land

    Nigel Inkster•Survival•2015

  • On domains

    Open Access•Chris McGuffin, Paul Mitchell•International Journal Canada s…•2014

  • Cooperation under the Security Dilemma

    Open Access•Robert Jervis•World Politics•1978

  • Deterrence Theory Revisited

    Open Access•Robert Jervis•World Politics•1979

  • Signaling Foreign Policy Interests

    Open Access•James D Fearon•Journal of Conflict Resolution•1997

  • Revisiting Reputation

    Open Access•Alex Weisiger, Keren Yarhi-Milo•International Organization•2015

  • The Illusion of Democratic Credibility

    Open Access•Alexander B Downes, Todd S Sechser•International Organization•2012

  • The Logic of Conventional Deterrence and the End of the Cold War

    Richard J Harknett•Security Studies•1994

  • Stuxnet and the Limits of Cyber Warfare

    Jon R Lindsay•Security Studies•2013

  • The dynamics of cyber conflict between rival antagonists, 2001-11

    Open Access•Brandon Valeriano, Ryan C Mane et al.•Journal of Peace Research•2014

  • The Cost of Empty Threats

    Open Access•Jack Snyder, Erica D Borghard•American Political Science Review•2011

Unique citing works23
Citations per year2,88
Citation span2018 - 2026 (9)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 21

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae