Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Does anonymity increase response rate in postal questionnaire surveys about sensitive subjects? A randomised trial

Bibliographic Data

ID11176306
AuthorsMoray J Campbell (0000-0002-3355-0928, University of Southampton), W E Waters (University of Southampton)
Year1990
Volume44
Issue1
Pages75-76
Publication date1990-03-01
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of Epidemiology and Community Health (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0143-005X • E-ISSN: 1470-2738
PublisherBMJ (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1136/jech.44.1.75
PMID2348155
OpenAlexW2042275844
LanguageEN
Citations received9
References cited3

STUDY OBJECTIVE--The aim of the study was to determine whether complete anonymity improves the response rates to a postal questionnaire. DESIGN--The study derived from a series of postal surveys on AIDS knowledge conducted on six different dates in 1986 and 1987. The sample was randomly divided into two, each group being sent the same questionnaire. One group was informed that the replies were anonymous, the other that they were not. The latter were sent reminders. SETTING--Recipients of the questionnaires were drawn from the Southampton electoral rolls. PARTICIPANTS--300 people in each survey (total 1800) were sent questionnaires, representing on each occasion a different 1:500 systematic sample. RESULTS--Response rate was 49% for the anonymous questionnaires and 51% for the numbered questionnaires. Reminders boosted the response in the numbered group to 72%. CONCLUSIONS--There is no evidence that anonymity improves response to postal questionnaires, but the use of reminders may do so

Anonymity · Computer security · Family medicine · Randomized controlled trial · Sample (material) · HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk · Medicine · Surgery · Survey Methodology and Nonresponse · Survey Sampling and Estimation Techniques

  • The Impact of Anonymity on Responses to Sensitive Questions 1

    Open Access•Anthony D Ong, David Weiss et al.•Journal of Applied Social…•2000

  • Methods to increase response to postal and electronic questionnaires

    Phil Edwards, Philip James Edwards et al.•Cochrane Database of Systematic…•2009

  • Religiosity and psychological health

    Open Access•Tommie Loraine Hill•SN Social Sciences•2022

  • Conserving Biodiversity in Farm Animals

    Albert Boaitey, Ellen Goddard et al.•Society & Natural Resources•2018

  • Does requesting sensitive information on postal questionnaires have an impact on response rates? A randomised controlled trial in the south west of England

    Timothy J Peters, I M Harvey et al.•Journal of Epidemiology and…•1998

  • Demographic characteristics and health behaviours of consenters to medical examination. Results from the Welsh Heart Health Survey

    Emma Pullen, Don Nutbeam et al.•Journal of Epidemiology and…•1992

  • Assessment of Sexual Behavior, Sexual Attitudes, and Sexual Risk in Sweden (1989–2003)

    Open Access•Claes Herlitz, Kristina Ramstedt•Archives of Sexual Behavior•2005

  • Sexual behaviour in the general population of Sweden

    Open Access•Claes Herlitz•Social Science & Medicine•1993

  • Effects of Identifiers in Mail Surveys

    Open Access•Meng-Li Yang, Ruoh Rong Yu et al.•CAM•2011

  • A useless raffle

    Ahmed K Mortagy, J B Howell et al.•Journal of Epidemiology and…•1985

Citations per year0.26
Citation span1992 - 2022 (31)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae